Abstract 440P
Background
This study aimed to determine whether molecular subtype does impact patient response to palliative radiotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.
Methods
All metastatic breast cancer patients referred for palliative radiotherapy (either for pain-relief or spinal cord/nerve decompression), between 2017 and 2022, were included in this study. Patient response to radiotherapy was evaluated at 3 weeks from radiotherapy. Re-irradiation need was assessed. Radiotherapy outcomes were statistically analyzed with regards to breast cancer molecular subtypes.
Results
Data of 137 metastatic breast cancer patients were evaluated. Ductal cell carcinoma was the most common histological type. Patients’ distribution according to molecular subtype was as follow: 17% of luminal A tumors, 72% of luminal B tumors, 6% of Her2 tumors and 5% of triple-negative tumors. All patients received single fraction palliative radiotherapy with a prescription dose of 8 Gy and 6 Gy respectively in 77 % and 13 % of cases. Forty-six patients were lost to follow-up and one patient didn’t complete treatment. Complete response to radiotherapy was reported in 21%, 54% and 50% of cases, respectively for luminal A, luminal B and Her2 tumors. No complete response was found in the triple-negative breast cancer subgroup. The “no response to radiotherapy” rate for luminal A and luminal B tumors, was 21% and 20% respectively. Re-irradiation of the same metastatic subsite was performed in 8 patients, all with luminal B molecular subtype. Although not statistically significant, luminal tumors tended to respond better to palliative radiotherapy when compared to non-luminal tumors, with a complete response rate of 48% versus 30% respectively (p=0.3). No statistically significant correlation was found between breast cancer molecular subtype and radiotherapy outcomes.
Conclusions
This study suggests that breast cancer subtypes do exhibit differential responses to palliative radiotherapy. Yet molecular subtype failed to reliably predict radiotherapy outcomes and identify patients who would derive greater than average benefit from palliative radiotherapy. Further studies are needed to identify reliable biomarkers predictive of likely radiotherapy sensitivity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
349P - The influence of diabetes on taxane-induced neurotoxicity and quality of life in breast cancer patients
Presenter: Erika Cimbro
Session: Poster session 03
350P - Quality of life data on sexual relations in early breast cancer patients
Presenter: María Garrido
Session: Poster session 03
351TiP - EORTC BCG 1984 – NOBLE: Noeoadjuvant olaparib and durvalumab for patients with BRCA-associated triple-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Emanuel Buhrer
Session: Poster session 03
352TiP - Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy plus/minus fasting-like approach in stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer patients: The phase II randomized BREAKFAST-2 trial
Presenter: Claudio Vernieri
Session: Poster session 03
355P - Reduction of anthracycline use with a combined imaging and pathology prediction model in the neoadjuvant I-SPY2 trial
Presenter: Angela DeMichele
Session: Poster session 03
356P - Prognostic value of the residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive lobular breast cancer: An international pooled cohort study
Presenter: Soumya Gottipati
Session: Poster session 03
357P - Prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) using diffuse optical breast scanner (DOB-Scan) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC)
Presenter: Phuong Thao Nguyen
Session: Poster session 03
358P - Major adverse cardiovascular event outcomes of adjuvant taxane + anthracycline versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older adults with triple-negative breast cancer: A SEER-Medicare study
Presenter: Savannah Roy
Session: Poster session 03