Abstract 440P
Background
This study aimed to determine whether molecular subtype does impact patient response to palliative radiotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.
Methods
All metastatic breast cancer patients referred for palliative radiotherapy (either for pain-relief or spinal cord/nerve decompression), between 2017 and 2022, were included in this study. Patient response to radiotherapy was evaluated at 3 weeks from radiotherapy. Re-irradiation need was assessed. Radiotherapy outcomes were statistically analyzed with regards to breast cancer molecular subtypes.
Results
Data of 137 metastatic breast cancer patients were evaluated. Ductal cell carcinoma was the most common histological type. Patients’ distribution according to molecular subtype was as follow: 17% of luminal A tumors, 72% of luminal B tumors, 6% of Her2 tumors and 5% of triple-negative tumors. All patients received single fraction palliative radiotherapy with a prescription dose of 8 Gy and 6 Gy respectively in 77 % and 13 % of cases. Forty-six patients were lost to follow-up and one patient didn’t complete treatment. Complete response to radiotherapy was reported in 21%, 54% and 50% of cases, respectively for luminal A, luminal B and Her2 tumors. No complete response was found in the triple-negative breast cancer subgroup. The “no response to radiotherapy” rate for luminal A and luminal B tumors, was 21% and 20% respectively. Re-irradiation of the same metastatic subsite was performed in 8 patients, all with luminal B molecular subtype. Although not statistically significant, luminal tumors tended to respond better to palliative radiotherapy when compared to non-luminal tumors, with a complete response rate of 48% versus 30% respectively (p=0.3). No statistically significant correlation was found between breast cancer molecular subtype and radiotherapy outcomes.
Conclusions
This study suggests that breast cancer subtypes do exhibit differential responses to palliative radiotherapy. Yet molecular subtype failed to reliably predict radiotherapy outcomes and identify patients who would derive greater than average benefit from palliative radiotherapy. Further studies are needed to identify reliable biomarkers predictive of likely radiotherapy sensitivity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
370P - LYMPHA surgery to reduce lymphedema following axillary node clearance: A new study at a London plastics centre
Presenter: Dorian Hobday
Session: Poster session 03
371P - Adherence to standardized and structured electronic symptom reporting (ePRO) via mobile app in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with HER2 biosimilar trastuzumab
Presenter: Andreas Trojan
Session: Poster session 03
372P - Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation among Indian breast cancer patients: A multicentre cross-sectional study
Presenter: Shona Nag
Session: Poster session 03
374P - Evaluation of symptom severity, tolerability, and physical function in the I-SPY2 trial
Presenter: Amrita Basu
Session: Poster session 03
375TiP - A phase I, 2-part, multicenter, first-in-human dose-escalation and dose-expansion study of DS-1103a with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Ludimila Cavalcante
Session: Poster session 03
388P - Subgroup analysis of patients (pts) with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with brain metastases (BMs) at baseline from DESTINY-Breast04, a randomized phase III study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) vs treatment of physician’s choice (TPC)
Presenter: Junji Tsurutani
Session: Poster session 03
391P - Detrimental effect on overall survival of CDK4/6 inhibitor dose reduction if immortal time bias is considered
Presenter: Andreas Bjerrum
Session: Poster session 03