Abstract 1632P
Background
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a steadily increasing incidence and a poor prognosis. Patient (pts) tumors’ derived organoids (PDO) are promising models for functional precision oncology (FPO). This study aims to evaluate whether PDO can be implemented in clinical practice for the management of PDAC pts.
Methods
During 2021-2022, pts were prospectively enrolled in an IRB-approved protocol (NCT04932525). Main inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed PDAC, at least one tumor accessible site (biopsy, surgery or effusions) and ECOG performance status 0-1. The efficacy of 25 antitumor therapies was tested (=chemogram) (ATP luminescence test). A scoring system was developed to rank drugs and to find hits.
Results
Overall, 81 patients were included (median age 61 years; median previous treatment lines 2 [range: 0-5]). 91% pts had previously received FOLFIRINOX, 61% gemcitabine and 49% (nab)-paclitaxel. PDO take-on rate was 62% (n=50/81) (notably, liver biopsy: 64%, ascites: 93%). Mean turnaround-time to chemogram was 6.7 weeks. Main PDO molecular alterations were KRAS (98%), TP53 (72%), CDKN2A/B (17%) and SMAD4 (17%) with good concordance rate (88%) with initial tumor. Median patients’ overall survival from PDO sampling was shorter when PDO were established (p<0.01). Median number of hits was 3 (range 0-12). In 89% of cases, at least 1 hit was identified, and in 84% of cases, at least one of the hits was not a Standard-of-Care (SOC, i.e., 5-FU, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, gemcitabine, or paclitaxel). Main identified hits were gemcitabine (n=17/50), docetaxel (n=16/50), olaparib (n=15/50), and vinorelbine (n=15/50). Evaluable pts that received a treatment that was a hit after PDO biopsy had a longer growth modulator index (GMI) (p= 0.0007) disease control rate (p=0.001) and progression-free survival (p=0.07, NS) than others. Sensitivity and specificity of PDO to predict pts response were 80% and 95.7% respectively.
Conclusions
We report a large prospective study that aims to implement PDO-based FPO for PDAC. In a clinically relevant turnaround time, at least one putative hit was identified in 89% of cases with good sensitivity and specificity. The benefit of PDO-based FPO warrant to be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04932525.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Institut National du cancer, Gustave Roussy, INSERM.
Disclosure
A. Hollebecque: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier, Incyte, EISAI; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Basilea, Tahio, Relay Therapeutics, QED Therapeutics, Debiopharm, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Incyte; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, M19-345: AbbVie; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, CO42216; WP42627; CO40939: Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, MCLA-158: Merus; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, SGNB6A: Seattle Genetics; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, TAS-120-202: Tahio; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Krystal-10: Mirati; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, ADP-0033: Adaptimmune; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, ACT16902: Sanofi; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, C4201002: Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, RLY-4008: Relay Therapeutics; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, CC-90011: Celgene/BMS; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Loxo-IDH: Loxo/Lilly; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, SN-201 study: Sotio; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Tropics-03: Gilead; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, BI1403: Boehringer Ingelheim.
Resources from the same session
1569P - The CODRP model for predicting drug sensitivity in patient-derived 3D gastric cancer cells
Presenter: Dong Woo Lee
Session: Poster session 22
1571P - Exploration of immune and metabolism gene signature for prognosis of esophageal carcinoma and establishment of a combined prediction model
Presenter: Hao Wu
Session: Poster session 22
1572P - Impact of HER2 and PD-L1 co-expression in Claudin18.2 positive resectable gastroesophageal cancers
Presenter: Antonella Cammarota
Session: Poster session 22
1573P - Involved field and elective nodal irradiation presented similar treatment efficiency in concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced ESCC
Presenter: Baosheng Li
Session: Poster session 22
1575P - Factors associated with uptake of adjuvant nivolumab in a nationwide esophageal cancer patient cohort
Presenter: Rob Verhoeven
Session: Poster session 22
1577P - Prior antibiotic administration disrupts outcomes of PD-1 blockade in advanced gastric cancer by altering gut microbiome and systemic immune response
Presenter: Chang Gon Kim
Session: Poster session 22
1578P - Effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic gastric cancer: A real-world evidence study
Presenter: Francesco Puccetti
Session: Poster session 22