Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 22

1632P - Organoids as tools for functional precision oncology in advanced pancreatic cancer

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 22

Topics

Cancer Research

Tumour Site

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Presenters

Alice Boileve

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S895-S924. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01944-0

Authors

J. Cartry1, N. Goudarzi1, S. Bedja1, J. Mathieu1, A. Mouawia1, C. Nicotra2, V. Boige3, D. Malka4, M. Valery3, A.A. Tarabay3, M.A. Bani5, P. DARTIGUES5, T. de Baere6, A. Italiano2, M. Gelli7, C. Smolenschi3, M.P. Ducreux3, A. hollebecque3, F. Jaulin1

Author affiliations

  • 1 U1279, Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 2 Ditep, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif, Cedex/FR
  • 3 Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif, Cedex/FR
  • 4 75, Institut mutaliste Montsouris, 75013 - Paris/FR
  • 5 Pathology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif, Cedex/FR
  • 6 Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 7 Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif, Cedex/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1632P

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a steadily increasing incidence and a poor prognosis. Patient (pts) tumors’ derived organoids (PDO) are promising models for functional precision oncology (FPO). This study aims to evaluate whether PDO can be implemented in clinical practice for the management of PDAC pts.

Methods

During 2021-2022, pts were prospectively enrolled in an IRB-approved protocol (NCT04932525). Main inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed PDAC, at least one tumor accessible site (biopsy, surgery or effusions) and ECOG performance status 0-1. The efficacy of 25 antitumor therapies was tested (=chemogram) (ATP luminescence test). A scoring system was developed to rank drugs and to find hits.

Results

Overall, 81 patients were included (median age 61 years; median previous treatment lines 2 [range: 0-5]). 91% pts had previously received FOLFIRINOX, 61% gemcitabine and 49% (nab)-paclitaxel. PDO take-on rate was 62% (n=50/81) (notably, liver biopsy: 64%, ascites: 93%). Mean turnaround-time to chemogram was 6.7 weeks. Main PDO molecular alterations were KRAS (98%), TP53 (72%), CDKN2A/B (17%) and SMAD4 (17%) with good concordance rate (88%) with initial tumor. Median patients’ overall survival from PDO sampling was shorter when PDO were established (p<0.01). Median number of hits was 3 (range 0-12). In 89% of cases, at least 1 hit was identified, and in 84% of cases, at least one of the hits was not a Standard-of-Care (SOC, i.e., 5-FU, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, gemcitabine, or paclitaxel). Main identified hits were gemcitabine (n=17/50), docetaxel (n=16/50), olaparib (n=15/50), and vinorelbine (n=15/50). Evaluable pts that received a treatment that was a hit after PDO biopsy had a longer growth modulator index (GMI) (p= 0.0007) disease control rate (p=0.001) and progression-free survival (p=0.07, NS) than others. Sensitivity and specificity of PDO to predict pts response were 80% and 95.7% respectively.

Conclusions

We report a large prospective study that aims to implement PDO-based FPO for PDAC. In a clinically relevant turnaround time, at least one putative hit was identified in 89% of cases with good sensitivity and specificity. The benefit of PDO-based FPO warrant to be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial.

Clinical trial identification

NCT04932525.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Institut National du cancer, Gustave Roussy, INSERM.

Disclosure

A. Hollebecque: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier, Incyte, EISAI; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Basilea, Tahio, Relay Therapeutics, QED Therapeutics, Debiopharm, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Incyte; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, M19-345: AbbVie; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, CO42216; WP42627; CO40939: Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, MCLA-158: Merus; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, SGNB6A: Seattle Genetics; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, TAS-120-202: Tahio; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Krystal-10: Mirati; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, ADP-0033: Adaptimmune; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, ACT16902: Sanofi; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, C4201002: Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, RLY-4008: Relay Therapeutics; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, CC-90011: Celgene/BMS; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Loxo-IDH: Loxo/Lilly; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, SN-201 study: Sotio; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Tropics-03: Gilead; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, BI1403: Boehringer Ingelheim.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.