Abstract 1632P
Background
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a steadily increasing incidence and a poor prognosis. Patient (pts) tumors’ derived organoids (PDO) are promising models for functional precision oncology (FPO). This study aims to evaluate whether PDO can be implemented in clinical practice for the management of PDAC pts.
Methods
During 2021-2022, pts were prospectively enrolled in an IRB-approved protocol (NCT04932525). Main inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed PDAC, at least one tumor accessible site (biopsy, surgery or effusions) and ECOG performance status 0-1. The efficacy of 25 antitumor therapies was tested (=chemogram) (ATP luminescence test). A scoring system was developed to rank drugs and to find hits.
Results
Overall, 81 patients were included (median age 61 years; median previous treatment lines 2 [range: 0-5]). 91% pts had previously received FOLFIRINOX, 61% gemcitabine and 49% (nab)-paclitaxel. PDO take-on rate was 62% (n=50/81) (notably, liver biopsy: 64%, ascites: 93%). Mean turnaround-time to chemogram was 6.7 weeks. Main PDO molecular alterations were KRAS (98%), TP53 (72%), CDKN2A/B (17%) and SMAD4 (17%) with good concordance rate (88%) with initial tumor. Median patients’ overall survival from PDO sampling was shorter when PDO were established (p<0.01). Median number of hits was 3 (range 0-12). In 89% of cases, at least 1 hit was identified, and in 84% of cases, at least one of the hits was not a Standard-of-Care (SOC, i.e., 5-FU, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, gemcitabine, or paclitaxel). Main identified hits were gemcitabine (n=17/50), docetaxel (n=16/50), olaparib (n=15/50), and vinorelbine (n=15/50). Evaluable pts that received a treatment that was a hit after PDO biopsy had a longer growth modulator index (GMI) (p= 0.0007) disease control rate (p=0.001) and progression-free survival (p=0.07, NS) than others. Sensitivity and specificity of PDO to predict pts response were 80% and 95.7% respectively.
Conclusions
We report a large prospective study that aims to implement PDO-based FPO for PDAC. In a clinically relevant turnaround time, at least one putative hit was identified in 89% of cases with good sensitivity and specificity. The benefit of PDO-based FPO warrant to be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04932525.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Institut National du cancer, Gustave Roussy, INSERM.
Disclosure
A. Hollebecque: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier, Incyte, EISAI; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Basilea, Tahio, Relay Therapeutics, QED Therapeutics, Debiopharm, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Incyte; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, M19-345: AbbVie; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, CO42216; WP42627; CO40939: Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, MCLA-158: Merus; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, SGNB6A: Seattle Genetics; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, TAS-120-202: Tahio; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Krystal-10: Mirati; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, ADP-0033: Adaptimmune; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, ACT16902: Sanofi; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, C4201002: Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, RLY-4008: Relay Therapeutics; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, CC-90011: Celgene/BMS; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Loxo-IDH: Loxo/Lilly; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, SN-201 study: Sotio; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Tropics-03: Gilead; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, BI1403: Boehringer Ingelheim.
Resources from the same session
1579P - Gender differences and worse metastatic survival outcomes in young adult patients with oesophagogastric cancer: 12-year data from a Czech comprehensive cancer center
Presenter: Tomás Sokop
Session: Poster session 22
1580P - Early onset oesophageal adenocarcinoma: A separate biological entity?
Presenter: Dharmesh Valand
Session: Poster session 22
1581P - Total neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX regimen in patients with resectable locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer
Presenter: Maria Sedova
Session: Poster session 22
1582P - Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma in young adults: Retrospective analysis of clinical and molecular features
Presenter: Daniel Acosta Eyzaguirre
Session: Poster session 22
1583P - Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases of gastric origin: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Niels Guchelaar
Session: Poster session 22
1585P - The impact of platinum-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) in first-line treatment on PN and efficacy in second-line paclitaxel (PTX)-based chemotherapy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer (AGC): A prospective observational multicenter study - IVY study
Presenter: Yoshiyasu Kono
Session: Poster session 22
1587P - Analysis of survival outcomes according to start timing of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer: A retrospective nationwide cohort study
Presenter: Tae-Hwan Kim
Session: Poster session 22
1588P - Analysis of risk factors of anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy with circular cervical anastomosis
Presenter: ming lu
Session: Poster session 22