Abstract 1632P
Background
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a steadily increasing incidence and a poor prognosis. Patient (pts) tumors’ derived organoids (PDO) are promising models for functional precision oncology (FPO). This study aims to evaluate whether PDO can be implemented in clinical practice for the management of PDAC pts.
Methods
During 2021-2022, pts were prospectively enrolled in an IRB-approved protocol (NCT04932525). Main inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed PDAC, at least one tumor accessible site (biopsy, surgery or effusions) and ECOG performance status 0-1. The efficacy of 25 antitumor therapies was tested (=chemogram) (ATP luminescence test). A scoring system was developed to rank drugs and to find hits.
Results
Overall, 81 patients were included (median age 61 years; median previous treatment lines 2 [range: 0-5]). 91% pts had previously received FOLFIRINOX, 61% gemcitabine and 49% (nab)-paclitaxel. PDO take-on rate was 62% (n=50/81) (notably, liver biopsy: 64%, ascites: 93%). Mean turnaround-time to chemogram was 6.7 weeks. Main PDO molecular alterations were KRAS (98%), TP53 (72%), CDKN2A/B (17%) and SMAD4 (17%) with good concordance rate (88%) with initial tumor. Median patients’ overall survival from PDO sampling was shorter when PDO were established (p<0.01). Median number of hits was 3 (range 0-12). In 89% of cases, at least 1 hit was identified, and in 84% of cases, at least one of the hits was not a Standard-of-Care (SOC, i.e., 5-FU, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, gemcitabine, or paclitaxel). Main identified hits were gemcitabine (n=17/50), docetaxel (n=16/50), olaparib (n=15/50), and vinorelbine (n=15/50). Evaluable pts that received a treatment that was a hit after PDO biopsy had a longer growth modulator index (GMI) (p= 0.0007) disease control rate (p=0.001) and progression-free survival (p=0.07, NS) than others. Sensitivity and specificity of PDO to predict pts response were 80% and 95.7% respectively.
Conclusions
We report a large prospective study that aims to implement PDO-based FPO for PDAC. In a clinically relevant turnaround time, at least one putative hit was identified in 89% of cases with good sensitivity and specificity. The benefit of PDO-based FPO warrant to be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04932525.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Institut National du cancer, Gustave Roussy, INSERM.
Disclosure
A. Hollebecque: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier, Incyte, EISAI; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Basilea, Tahio, Relay Therapeutics, QED Therapeutics, Debiopharm, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Incyte; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, M19-345: AbbVie; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, CO42216; WP42627; CO40939: Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, MCLA-158: Merus; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, SGNB6A: Seattle Genetics; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, TAS-120-202: Tahio; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Krystal-10: Mirati; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, ADP-0033: Adaptimmune; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, ACT16902: Sanofi; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, C4201002: Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, RLY-4008: Relay Therapeutics; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, CC-90011: Celgene/BMS; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Loxo-IDH: Loxo/Lilly; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, SN-201 study: Sotio; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Tropics-03: Gilead; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, BI1403: Boehringer Ingelheim.
Resources from the same session
1645P - STAT3, ACTA2, and SPARC stromal markers predict response to Gemcitabine/Cisplatin/Nab-paclitaxel (GCN) in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (apdac)
Presenter: Himil Mahadevia
Session: Poster session 22
1646P - Genomic and prognostic differences in patients with different KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Chunwei Xu
Session: Poster session 22
1647P - Cancer-associated endocrine cell: A novel component of tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Yuan Chen
Session: Poster session 22
1648P - Association between circulating tumor cell count and thrombosis in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Monica Benavente
Session: Poster session 22
1649P - Comprehensive genomic profiling contributes to the prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Eiichiro So
Session: Poster session 22
1650P - Identification of potential targets in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: The KRAS Wild-Type subset
Presenter: Daniel Acosta Eyzaguirre
Session: Poster session 22
1651P - Comparison of surgical outcome and prognostic factors between pancreaticobiliary and intestinal types of periampullary adenocarcinoma following pancreaticoduodenectomy
Presenter: Saad Anwar
Session: Poster session 22
1652P - Interaction between enhanced cytokine signalling and ferroptosis defence fuels obesity-associated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma oncogenesis
Presenter: Rishat Ruzi
Session: Poster session 22
1653P - The activated thermogenesis of intra-pancreatic fat fuels the progression of pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Xi'n'peng Yin
Session: Poster session 22
1654P - Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as prognostic factor for pancreatic cancer: Updated of a prospective study
Presenter: Natalia Gutierrez Alonso
Session: Poster session 22