Abstract 1100P
Background
Melanoma patients (pts) progressing after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BRAF targeting therapy have a poor prognosis. We explored the feasibility of a combination of the alkylating deacetylase inhibition fusion molecule tinostamustine in sub-chemotherapeutic concentrations and nivolumab.
Methods
This study was initiated to characterize dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the recommended phase-2 dose (RP2D) of tinostamustine and nivolumab in pts with advanced melanoma. Tinostamustine was administered at escalating doses of 15 and 30 mg/m2 in a 3-plus-3 design, nivolumab was added at a dose of 3 mg/kg on day 15, both given i.v. every 2 weeks until toxicity or tumor progression (with the option of treatment-beyond progression).
Results
17 pts were included into the study including 4 pts treated with tinostamustine 15 mg/m2 over 60 min and 13 pts treated with tinostamustine 30 mg/m2 over 60 min. 13/17 pts (77%) received prior ICI, 7/17 pts (41%) had unfavorable melanoma types (acral, mucosal, uveal) and 10/17 pts (59%) elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). No DLT was documented and the RP2D for tinostamustine in combination with nivolumab was defined as 30mg/m2over 60 min. We observed one nivolumab-associated serious adverse event (SAE) of immune-related pneumonitis. Mean treatment duration was 22 weeks; 3 patients received ≤4 weeks of study treatment due to early progression. Disease stabilization among 15 evaluable pts was 47%, including 3pts (20%) with a confirmed partial response. Median progression-free survival was 8.3 weeks (95% CI 2.4 to 15.4 weeks), median overall survival 19.1 weeks (95% CI 2.4 to 41 weeks). No severe myelosuppression was observed except a single case of grade 3 leucocytopenia.Ex vivo T-cell stimulation and ELISA from blood samples revealed induction of adaptive T-cell and antibody responses against tumor-associated antigens.
Conclusions
Tinostamustine at an immune-modulatory dose of 30 mg/m2 over 60 min is safe when co-administered with nivolumab 3mg/kg and resulted in 47% disease stabilization and 20% objective radiological responses in pts with advanced melanoma failing standard ICI treatment.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03903458.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Clinical Trial Unit, Cantonal Hospital, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Funding
Mundipharma.
Disclosure
M. Joerger: Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, Clinical study activity: Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Immunophotonics, MSD, Novartis, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Clinical study activity: Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, Clinical study activity: InnoMedica; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Debiopharm, MSD, Roche, Sanofi. K. Koster: Other, Personal, Other, Travel grant: Jansen; Other, Personal, Officer, Travel grant: Takeda. D. Hess: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Novartis, Roche. Y. Metaxas: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel grant: Roche. S. Aeppli: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, Pfizer, Merck. T.P. El Saadany: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Writing Engagement: Merck, Pfizer. R.A.F. von Moos: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Gilead, Merck, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, MSD, Vifor, GSK, PharmaMar, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel grant: Takeda, Pierre Fabre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1110P - A phase II clinical trial of SHR-1701 combined with temozolomide for advanced melanoma
Presenter: Tu Hu
Session: Poster session 13
1111P - A randomised phase II study of intermittent versus continuous dosing of targeted therapy in patients with BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma (INTERIM)
Presenter: Avinash Gupta
Session: Poster session 13
1112P - Five-year survival after intermittent targeted therapy and anti-PD1 in stage IV melanoma: An update of the IMPemBra trial
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1113P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (enco) + binimetinib (bini) vs vemurafenib (vemu) or enco in patients (pts) with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 13
1114P - Encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) in unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma, real-world evidence in Spain (GEM 2002 - BECARE)
Presenter: Ainara Soria Rivas
Session: Poster session 13
1115P - Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of dabrafenib/trametinib versus vemurafenib/cobimetinib therapy in routine medical practice: Eight years of BRAF/MEK inhibitor use in routine clinical practice
Presenter: Karolina Piejko
Session: Poster session 13
1116P - Long term outcome of complete responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or target therapy (TT) in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster session 13
1117P - Overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI): Comparing real-world vs clinical trial data
Presenter: Gino In
Session: Poster session 13
1118P - Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with BRAF+ metastatic melanoma refractory to first-line immunotherapy
Presenter: Thach-Giao Truong
Session: Poster session 13
1119P - Stage IIIA melanoma with isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes: Time for reviewing the AJCC v8 classification
Presenter: Teresa Amaral
Session: Poster session 13