Abstract 1100P
Background
Melanoma patients (pts) progressing after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BRAF targeting therapy have a poor prognosis. We explored the feasibility of a combination of the alkylating deacetylase inhibition fusion molecule tinostamustine in sub-chemotherapeutic concentrations and nivolumab.
Methods
This study was initiated to characterize dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the recommended phase-2 dose (RP2D) of tinostamustine and nivolumab in pts with advanced melanoma. Tinostamustine was administered at escalating doses of 15 and 30 mg/m2 in a 3-plus-3 design, nivolumab was added at a dose of 3 mg/kg on day 15, both given i.v. every 2 weeks until toxicity or tumor progression (with the option of treatment-beyond progression).
Results
17 pts were included into the study including 4 pts treated with tinostamustine 15 mg/m2 over 60 min and 13 pts treated with tinostamustine 30 mg/m2 over 60 min. 13/17 pts (77%) received prior ICI, 7/17 pts (41%) had unfavorable melanoma types (acral, mucosal, uveal) and 10/17 pts (59%) elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). No DLT was documented and the RP2D for tinostamustine in combination with nivolumab was defined as 30mg/m2over 60 min. We observed one nivolumab-associated serious adverse event (SAE) of immune-related pneumonitis. Mean treatment duration was 22 weeks; 3 patients received ≤4 weeks of study treatment due to early progression. Disease stabilization among 15 evaluable pts was 47%, including 3pts (20%) with a confirmed partial response. Median progression-free survival was 8.3 weeks (95% CI 2.4 to 15.4 weeks), median overall survival 19.1 weeks (95% CI 2.4 to 41 weeks). No severe myelosuppression was observed except a single case of grade 3 leucocytopenia.Ex vivo T-cell stimulation and ELISA from blood samples revealed induction of adaptive T-cell and antibody responses against tumor-associated antigens.
Conclusions
Tinostamustine at an immune-modulatory dose of 30 mg/m2 over 60 min is safe when co-administered with nivolumab 3mg/kg and resulted in 47% disease stabilization and 20% objective radiological responses in pts with advanced melanoma failing standard ICI treatment.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03903458.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Clinical Trial Unit, Cantonal Hospital, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Funding
Mundipharma.
Disclosure
M. Joerger: Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, Clinical study activity: Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Immunophotonics, MSD, Novartis, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Clinical study activity: Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, Clinical study activity: InnoMedica; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Debiopharm, MSD, Roche, Sanofi. K. Koster: Other, Personal, Other, Travel grant: Jansen; Other, Personal, Officer, Travel grant: Takeda. D. Hess: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Novartis, Roche. Y. Metaxas: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel grant: Roche. S. Aeppli: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, Pfizer, Merck. T.P. El Saadany: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Writing Engagement: Merck, Pfizer. R.A.F. von Moos: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Gilead, Merck, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, MSD, Vifor, GSK, PharmaMar, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel grant: Takeda, Pierre Fabre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1120P - Development and external validation of a clinical prediction model to predict recurrence-free survival and melanoma-specific survival in patients with melanoma after sentinel lymph node biopsy
Presenter: Robert Stassen
Session: Poster session 13
1121P - Interferon-gamma (IFNy) gene signature as a predictive biomarker for response in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) low advanced melanoma patients
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1122P - Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and systemic inflammatory index as prognostic biomarkers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune checkpoint inhibitors: Could any of them be used?
Presenter: Maria Menezes
Session: Poster session 13
1123P - Baseline tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to immune checkpoint inhibition in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Mark Schuiveling
Session: Poster session 13
1124P - IL-6 as prognostic factor in adjuvant or metastatic skin cancer patients treated with immunotherapy: A deep biomarker analysis
Presenter: Domenico Mallardo
Session: Poster session 13
1125P - Identification of a subset of metastatic melanoma patients demonstrating germline determined insensitivity to immunotherapy
Presenter: Benjamin Fairfax
Session: Poster session 13
1126P - REtrospective Study of definitive therapy for head and neck mUcosal MElanoma: The RESUME study
Presenter: Motoo Nomura
Session: Poster session 13
1127P - Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced mucosal melanoma (MM): A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: James Pham
Session: Poster session 13
1128P - A phase I dose escalation and expansion study of FHD-286, a novel BRG1/BRM (SMARCA4/SMARCA2) inhibitor, for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma
Presenter: Sapna Patel
Session: Poster session 13
1129P - Effect of subsequent therapies including checkpoint inhibitors on overall survival in a phase III randomized trial of tebentafusp in first-line metastatic uveal melanoma: Long-term follow-up
Presenter: Marlana Orloff
Session: Poster session 13