Abstract 1100P
Background
Melanoma patients (pts) progressing after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BRAF targeting therapy have a poor prognosis. We explored the feasibility of a combination of the alkylating deacetylase inhibition fusion molecule tinostamustine in sub-chemotherapeutic concentrations and nivolumab.
Methods
This study was initiated to characterize dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the recommended phase-2 dose (RP2D) of tinostamustine and nivolumab in pts with advanced melanoma. Tinostamustine was administered at escalating doses of 15 and 30 mg/m2 in a 3-plus-3 design, nivolumab was added at a dose of 3 mg/kg on day 15, both given i.v. every 2 weeks until toxicity or tumor progression (with the option of treatment-beyond progression).
Results
17 pts were included into the study including 4 pts treated with tinostamustine 15 mg/m2 over 60 min and 13 pts treated with tinostamustine 30 mg/m2 over 60 min. 13/17 pts (77%) received prior ICI, 7/17 pts (41%) had unfavorable melanoma types (acral, mucosal, uveal) and 10/17 pts (59%) elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). No DLT was documented and the RP2D for tinostamustine in combination with nivolumab was defined as 30mg/m2over 60 min. We observed one nivolumab-associated serious adverse event (SAE) of immune-related pneumonitis. Mean treatment duration was 22 weeks; 3 patients received ≤4 weeks of study treatment due to early progression. Disease stabilization among 15 evaluable pts was 47%, including 3pts (20%) with a confirmed partial response. Median progression-free survival was 8.3 weeks (95% CI 2.4 to 15.4 weeks), median overall survival 19.1 weeks (95% CI 2.4 to 41 weeks). No severe myelosuppression was observed except a single case of grade 3 leucocytopenia.Ex vivo T-cell stimulation and ELISA from blood samples revealed induction of adaptive T-cell and antibody responses against tumor-associated antigens.
Conclusions
Tinostamustine at an immune-modulatory dose of 30 mg/m2 over 60 min is safe when co-administered with nivolumab 3mg/kg and resulted in 47% disease stabilization and 20% objective radiological responses in pts with advanced melanoma failing standard ICI treatment.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03903458.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Clinical Trial Unit, Cantonal Hospital, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Funding
Mundipharma.
Disclosure
M. Joerger: Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, Clinical study activity: Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Immunophotonics, MSD, Novartis, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Clinical study activity: Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, Clinical study activity: InnoMedica; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Debiopharm, MSD, Roche, Sanofi. K. Koster: Other, Personal, Other, Travel grant: Jansen; Other, Personal, Officer, Travel grant: Takeda. D. Hess: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Novartis, Roche. Y. Metaxas: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel grant: Roche. S. Aeppli: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, Pfizer, Merck. T.P. El Saadany: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Writing Engagement: Merck, Pfizer. R.A.F. von Moos: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Gilead, Merck, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, MSD, Vifor, GSK, PharmaMar, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel grant: Takeda, Pierre Fabre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1140P - Cemiplimab versus historical systemic treatments for locally advanced (la) or metastatic (m) cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (CSCC): Results from the French study TOSCA
Presenter: Emilie Gerard
Session: Poster session 13
1141P - Early discontinuation of cemiplimab in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Elena Croce
Session: Poster session 13
1142P - Personalized decision making in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Integrating a clinico-pathological model for absolute metastatic risk into the staging systems
Presenter: Marlies Wakkee
Session: Poster session 13
1143P - Changes in peripheral and local tumor immunity after cemiplimab treatment early describe clinical outcomes in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Daniela Esposito
Session: Poster session 13
1144P - High-plex spatial profiling of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to identify biomarkers associated with clinical outcomes: The cMIC study
Presenter: Rahul Ladwa
Session: Poster session 13
1145P - Clinical characteristics and survival of patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) treated with avelumab: Analysis of a prospective German MCC registry (MCC TRIM)
Presenter: Juergen Becker
Session: Poster session 13
1146P - Updated results from POD1UM-201: A phase II study of retifanlimab in patients with advanced or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC)
Presenter: Giovanni Grignani
Session: Poster session 13
1148P - Avelumab as second-line or later (2L+) treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC): Real-world tx patterns in France
Presenter: Astrid Blom Fily
Session: Poster session 13
1149P - Prognosis for patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma with a complete response on avelumab treatment
Presenter: Lisanne Zijlker
Session: Poster session 13