Abstract 162P
Background
Radiomics has emerged as a potential tool to predict clinical outcomes in prostate cancer (Pca ). MRI has a fundamental role in staging and radiotherapy planning, being affected in the case of receiving prior androgen deprivation treatment (ADT). The aim of this study was to determine imaging biomarker profiles that allow to identify patients with a worse prognosis and a higher risk of biochemical relapse (BQR).
Methods
A single-center, retrospective, observational study was designed. Baseline MRIs (T2w, DWI and/or DCE sequences) from PCa patients treated with ADT and radiotherapy were included. Using Quibim’s QP-Prostate ® solution, subregions (Transition + Central Zone [TZ + CZ], Peripheral zone [PZ] and seminal vesicles [SV]) were automatically segmented. For each subregion and for the whole prostate (WP), computed using the weighted biomarkers averaging, 105 radiomic features (shape and textures) from T2w, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) variables from DWI and perfusion parameters from DCE were extracted.
Results
A total of 128 T2w, 107 DWI and 62 DCE MRIs from 128 PCa patients (32 [25%] low or favourable intermediate risk [group 1] and 96 (75%) high or unfavourable intermediate risk [group 2]) were included, of whom 20 (16%) experienced BQR (18 [19%] from group 2). According to risk stratification, patients from group 1 presented more homogeneous textures in PZ and WP than group 2. Regarding BQR, the ADC mean was higher in the TZ in those who did not relapse, while patients with greater major axis length in the PZ, WP and SV were more likely to relapse. In SV and WP heterogenicity-related feature values were significantly higher in BQR. In group 2, diffusion parameters and shape variables in the SV were significantly different in those experiencing BQR.
Conclusions
Imaging biomarker profiles in this PCa population may help to better stratify patients at risk based on baseline MRIs. High-risk patients may be identified by the heterogeneity of textures. Diffusion and texture parameters may determine a higher probability of relapse.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
134P - TERT-associated DNA polymerases genes link CAF and CD8+ T cells to improve immunotherapy response rate across multiple cancers
Presenter: Zhiwen Luo
Session: Poster session 01
135P - The lymphocyte stability index (LSI) forms a pan-cancer peripheral biomarker for overall survival post initiation of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)
Presenter: Robert Watson
Session: Poster session 01
136P - Pembrolizumab in patients of Chinese descent with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient advanced solid tumors: KEYNOTE-158
Presenter: Yimin Mao
Session: Poster session 01
137P - VEGFR-3 expression profiling by histology and mRNA signature to classify patient population for the selective VEGFR-3 inhibitor EVT801
Presenter: Carlos Gomez-Roca
Session: Poster session 01
138P - Precision medicine phase II study evaluating the efficacy of olaparib in patients with progressive solid cancers and carriers of homologous recombination repair genes alterations
Presenter: Marie Polito
Session: Poster session 01
139P - The characteristics in Chinese NSCLC patients with different BRAF mutation classes
Presenter: Qian Wang
Session: Poster session 01
140P - Colorectal adenoma subtypes exhibit distinct molecular profiles- implications to early detection
Presenter: Francesco Mancuso
Session: Poster session 01
141P - Microsatellite instability and its relationship with systemic inflammation as prognostic factors in localised colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ja Hyun Yeo
Session: Poster session 01
142P - Correlating total tumor volume on CT-Scan and liquid biopsy ctDNA in 1017 patients with metastatic cancer: A novel study
Presenter: Younes Belkouchi
Session: Poster session 01
143P - Is liquid biopsy a good tool for microsatellite instability (MSI) assessment in solid tumors?
Presenter: Julieta Rodriguez
Session: Poster session 01