Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 01

166P - Metabolomic prediction of breast cancer treatment toxicities

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 01

Topics

Cancer Biology;  Translational Research;  Genetic and Genomic Testing;  Management of Systemic Therapy Toxicities;  Statistics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Max Piffoux

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S233-S277. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01932-4

Authors

M. Piffoux1, J. jacquemin2, M. petera3, S. Boyault4, A. Martin5, S. EVERHARD6, F. André7, B. Pistilli8, M. fournier9, P. Rouanet10, A. Dhaini Merimeche11, B. sauterey12, M. Campone13, C. Tarpin14, M.A. Mouret Reynier15, O. Rigal16, T. Petit17, E. pujos guillot18, Y. drouet2, O. Tredan19

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 - Lyon/FR
  • 2 Direction De La Recherche Clinique Et De L'innovation, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 - Lyon/FR
  • 3 Unité De Nutrition Humaine, inrae, 63170 - Aubière/FR
  • 4 Cancer Genomic, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 - Lyon/FR
  • 5 Biostatistics, Unicancer, 75654 - Paris, Cedex/FR
  • 6 Ucbg, UNICANCER, 75654 - Paris/FR
  • 7 Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 8 Breast Cancer Group, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif, Cedex/FR
  • 9 Medical Oncology, Institute Bergonié - Centre Régional de Lutte Contre le Cancer (CLCC), 33000 - Bordeaux/FR
  • 10 Medical Oncology, CRLC Val d'Aurelle, La Défense/FR
  • 11 Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin, 54519 - Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy/FR
  • 12 Medical Oncology, ICO - Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, 49055 - Angers, Cedex/FR
  • 13 Medical Oncology Department, ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau, 44805 - Saint-Herblain/FR
  • 14 Medical Oncology, IPC - Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13273 - Marseille, Cedex/FR
  • 15 Medical Oncology, Jean Perrin Center, 63011 - Clermont-Ferrand/FR
  • 16 Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, 76038 - Rouen/FR
  • 17 Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer, 67065 - Strasbourg/FR
  • 18 Plateforme D’exploration Du Métabolisme, Metabohub, INRAE, 63170 - Aubière/FR
  • 19 Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 - Lyon/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 166P

Background

Long term treatment related toxicity is a major issue for breast cancer patients in the adjuvant setting. Predicting toxicities may allow us to adapt the treatment strategy. We assessed whether the metabolomic profile of patients may predict long-term toxicities.

Methods

High-resolution untargeted metabolomics was performed at baseline for 857 ER-positive, HER2- breast cancer patients from the CANTO prospective cohort. Four metabolomic profiles per patient were produced: (i) shared and annotated metabolites (n=224), (ii) annotated but not always common metabolites (n=456), (iii) annotated but not always shared metabolites (n=766) and (iv) all metabolites (n=1693, FullMet). Samples were split into a discovery and validation set. We benchmarked algorithms adapted for high dimensional analysis (LASSO, Adaptive LASSO, machine learning, and deep learning) in order to select best models for prediction.

Results

30.0% of patients were >65 years old, 24.4% <50 years old, 20.4% had BMI>30, 12.7% had previous history of neurological disorders, 6.1% had diabetes. 69.6% presented with pT1, 25.7% with pT2 and 3.4% with pT3; 11.1% had lymph node involvement. Among all benchmarked, adaptive LASSO was the most interesting statistical method with limited optimism bias. It also allows the selection of a subset of metabolites of particular interest. The addition of rare metabolites as well as non-annotated metabolites significantly increase the predictive power of models. Metabolic toxicity prediction mainly relied on endogenous metabolites while neurological toxicities were partly predicted using exogenous/environmental metabolites. In the validation set, compared to clinical data alone (AUC 0.50-0.54), addition of metabolomics data shows moderate (AUC = 0.55-0.60) but significant (p<0.05 adjusted for multiple comparison) predictive ability for neurological and metabolic toxicities.

Conclusions

Breast cancer patient metabolomic profile at baseline improves toxicity prediction after adjuvant chemotherapy, similar to what is reported for genomic fingerprints. Untargeted metabolomics allows the achievement of higher performance by taking into account environmental exposure, metabolites linked to microbiota as well as rare and uncommon metabolites.

Clinical trial identification

NCT01993498.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

CANTO consortium.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.