Abstract 1003P
Background
Multimodal approach, a combination of various treatment modalities, has emerged as a potential approach for treating uHCC. It is utilized to help relieve tumor burden, slow progression, and provide survival benefits to patients. However, controversies remain in using a multimodal approach in the management of uHCC, and is still debatable. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy composed of Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), TKI, and ICI compared to dual combination therapy (TACE+TKI, TKI+ICI).
Methods
Eligible studies published before March 30, 2023 were retrieved. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and occurrence of adverse events (AEs). Literature search was done using through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Risk of bias assessment was done using ROBINS-I tool.
Results
Thirteen retrospective studies were included representing 1005 patients with uHCC. There was low to moderate bias among the studies. Triple combination therapy was associated with a significant improvement in survival compared to dual combination therapy: median OS, pooled HR 0.46 (95% CI: 0.39-0.54, p<0.00001) and median PFS, pooled HR 0.41 (95% CI: 0.28-0.61, p<0.00001). Triple combination therapy was also associated with a significant increase in tumor response compared to dual combination therapy: ORR, pooled RR 1.76 (95% CI: 1.51-2.06, p<0.00001), and DCR, pooled RR 1.36 (95% CI 1.24-1.49, p-<0.00001). However, triple combination therapy had a higher risk of adverse events compared to dual combination therapy, pooled RR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.19, 1.86, p=0.0004). There was no significant heterogeneity found among the studies included.
Conclusions
Triple combination therapy was associated with significantly better outcomes but higher risk of adverse events than dual combination therapy in patients with uHCC so careful consideration of the risks and benefits must be done before initiating treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
946P - Sintilimab plus lenvatinib as conversion therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective, non-randomized, open-label, phase II, expansion cohort study
Presenter: Shichun Lu
Session: Poster session 18
947P - The efficacy and safety of cadonilimab combined with lenvatinib for first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase Ib/II clinical trial
Presenter: Li Bai
Session: Poster session 18
949P - Regorafenib combined with immunotherapy versus regorafenib as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter real-world study
Presenter: Bin-Kui Li
Session: Poster session 18
952P - Efficacy and safety of a PRospective, Observational trial of Lenvatinib cOmbined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as initial treatment for advaNced staGe hepatocellular carcinoma (PROLONG): A multicenter, single-armed, real-world study
Presenter: Guoliang Shao
Session: Poster session 18
953P - Tislelizumab plus regorafenib as second-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A single-arm, phase II trial
Presenter: Zhongchao Li
Session: Poster session 18
954P - Radiotherapy combined with tislelizumab plus anlotinib as first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: A single arm, phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Guishu wu
Session: Poster session 18
955P - IMMUNIB trial (AIO-HEP-0218/ass): A single-arm phase II study evaluating safety and efficacy of immunotherapy with nivolumab in combination with lenvatinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Arndt Vogel
Session: Poster session 18