Abstract 1003P
Background
Multimodal approach, a combination of various treatment modalities, has emerged as a potential approach for treating uHCC. It is utilized to help relieve tumor burden, slow progression, and provide survival benefits to patients. However, controversies remain in using a multimodal approach in the management of uHCC, and is still debatable. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy composed of Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), TKI, and ICI compared to dual combination therapy (TACE+TKI, TKI+ICI).
Methods
Eligible studies published before March 30, 2023 were retrieved. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and occurrence of adverse events (AEs). Literature search was done using through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Risk of bias assessment was done using ROBINS-I tool.
Results
Thirteen retrospective studies were included representing 1005 patients with uHCC. There was low to moderate bias among the studies. Triple combination therapy was associated with a significant improvement in survival compared to dual combination therapy: median OS, pooled HR 0.46 (95% CI: 0.39-0.54, p<0.00001) and median PFS, pooled HR 0.41 (95% CI: 0.28-0.61, p<0.00001). Triple combination therapy was also associated with a significant increase in tumor response compared to dual combination therapy: ORR, pooled RR 1.76 (95% CI: 1.51-2.06, p<0.00001), and DCR, pooled RR 1.36 (95% CI 1.24-1.49, p-<0.00001). However, triple combination therapy had a higher risk of adverse events compared to dual combination therapy, pooled RR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.19, 1.86, p=0.0004). There was no significant heterogeneity found among the studies included.
Conclusions
Triple combination therapy was associated with significantly better outcomes but higher risk of adverse events than dual combination therapy in patients with uHCC so careful consideration of the risks and benefits must be done before initiating treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
998P - Efficacy and safety of curative hepatectomy after conversion therapies for initial unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter propensity score matching study
Presenter: Rong-yun Mai
Session: Poster session 18
1000P - Real-world clinical outcomes of cabozantinib (cabo) as a second-line (2L) treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Daniel Ahn
Session: Poster session 18
1001P - Patients’ prioritization of treatment goals in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A global qualitative observational study (PERIDOT)
Presenter: Marcus-Alexander Wörns
Session: Poster session 18
1002P - Efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with TKIs and FOLFOX4-HAIC in conversion therapy of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Kai Tan
Session: Poster session 18
1004P - Comparative efficacy of systemic sequential regorafenib after sorafenib or lenvatinib treatment failure for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, multi-center, real-world study
Presenter: Danjun Song
Session: Poster session 18
1005P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combined with transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden
Presenter: Jiliang Qiu
Session: Poster session 18
1006P - Associations of online search trends and prescription trends for hepatocellular carcinoma drugs
Presenter: Philipp Berning
Session: Poster session 18
1007P - Network meta-analysis (NMA) of lenvatinib vs key comparators in first-line unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)
Presenter: David Trueman
Session: Poster session 18