Abstract 2255P
Background
The recent development of direct KRAS inhibitors has changed the treatment landscape of patients (pts) with oncogenic KRAS mutations. However, whether KRAS amplification (KRASAMP) also defines a unique subset of cancers and represents a potential target for drug development is unknown.
Methods
Clinicogenomic data and outcomes were abstracted from independent cohorts of human cancers with genomic profiling at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, AACR-GENIE v.13, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and 212 other studies, and examined according to KRASAMP status. We also correlated KRASAMP with KRAS RNA and protein expression using whole transcriptome and proteomics data from the TCGA and the Cancer Cell Lines Encyclopedia.
Results
Among 103,523 pts with solid and hematologic cancers, KRASAMP was identified in 1,744 (1.7%) of cases. KRASAMP was most prevalent in germ cell tumors (16.3%), esophagogastric (7.5%), ovarian (4.2%), pancreatic (2.2%), breast (2%), colorectal (CRC, 1.2%), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 1.2%). Among these pts, median age was 61, 61.5% were ever smokers, 85.4% were white, and 71.8% had poorly differentiated cancers. Compared to KRAS diploid cases, KRASAMP cancers had a higher fraction of the genome altered (p<0.01). Microsatellite instability scores were also higher in KRASAMP tumors from patients with breast, esophagogastric, germ cell, pancreatic and NSCLC (p<0.01), but not in CRC (p=0.22). Tumor mutational burden was higher (p<0.01) among CRC, NSCLC, and esophagogastric cancers with KRASAMP vs KRAS diploid. Compared to KRAS diploid samples, KRASAMP samples had increased KRAS mRNA (p<0.01) and protein expression (p<0.01). Among pts with clinical outcome data (N=41,900), median overall survival (OS) was shorter in all comers with KRASAMP vs KRAS diploid genotype (adjusted HR 1.68, p<0.01), and in each cancer type analyzed separately. KRASAMP conferred worse survival outcomes in pts with both KRAS wild-type (N=35,599, adjusted HR 1.38, p=0.01) and KRAS-mutant (N=6,301, adjusted HR 1.70, p<0.01) cancers.
Conclusions
KRAS amplification defines a novel subset of human cancers characterized by distinct genomic features, and worse survival. Novel therapeutic strategies to target KRASAMP may improve outcomes in pts with cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Biagio Ricciuti.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
B. Ricciuti: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Regeneron. P.A. Jänne: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting fees for advice on drug development: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Voronoi, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Sanofi, Takeda Oncology, Mirati Therapeutics, Trasncenta, Silicon Therapeutics, Syndax, Nuvalent, Bayer, Eisai, Allorion Therapeutics, Accutar Biotech, AbbVie, Duality Biologics; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting fees for advice on diagnostic development: Biocartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting fee for advice on drug development: Merus, Frontier Medicines; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting fees for advice on drug development: Hongyun Biotechnology; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Gatekeeper Pharmaceuticals, Allorion Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties, I receive post-marketing royalties from being an inventor on a DFCI owned patent on EGFR mutations licensed to Lab Corp: Lab Corp; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Sponsored research agreement with my institution: AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, PUMA, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Revolution Medicines, Takeda Oncology. M.M. Awad: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merk, BMS, AZ, Genentech, Nekter, Maverick, Blueprint Medicine, AbbVie, Gritstone, ArcherDX, Mirati; Financial Interests, Advisory Board: NextCure. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2295P - Pan-cancer prevalence of MET fusions and clinical response to MET- targeted therapy
Presenter: Morana Vojnic
Session: Poster session 08
2296P - SGLT2 i dapagliflozin reduces NF-kB expression in heart and kidneys of preclinical models exposed to doxorubicin through MYd-88 and NLRP3 pathways
Presenter: Nicola Maurea
Session: Poster session 08
2297P - Gene co-expression networks capture the potential pathogenesis and progression of upper tract urothelial cancer
Presenter: Tingting Fu
Session: Poster session 08
2298P - Feasibility of ex vivo drug sensitivity testing in urothelial cancer: EVITA trial
Presenter: Mathijs Scholtes
Session: Poster session 08
2299P - Mebendazole enhances the anticancer effect of irinotecan and check-point inhibitor in vitro and in vivo
Presenter: Sharmineh Mansoori
Session: Poster session 08
2300P - Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) as monotherapy: Analysis of the PREMIS study
Presenter: Julieta Rodriguez
Session: Poster session 08
2301P - Combining cancer patient spatial transcriptomics and bulk RNA-Seq data to drive insights into NSCLC
Presenter: Julia Bischof
Session: Poster session 08
2302P - Efficacy assessment of targeted and immunotherapies for personalised treatment of melanoma using 2D and 3D ex-vivo assays
Presenter: Md Marufur Rahman
Session: Poster session 08
2303P - Protein functional interpretation of gene variants observed in clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) for pleural mesothelioma
Presenter: Ferdinando Cerciello
Session: Poster session 08
2304P - A phase II study of tepotinib in patients with advanced solid cancers harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutations or amplification (KCSG AL19 -17)
Presenter: Eun Joo Kang
Session: Poster session 08