Abstract 2255P
Background
The recent development of direct KRAS inhibitors has changed the treatment landscape of patients (pts) with oncogenic KRAS mutations. However, whether KRAS amplification (KRASAMP) also defines a unique subset of cancers and represents a potential target for drug development is unknown.
Methods
Clinicogenomic data and outcomes were abstracted from independent cohorts of human cancers with genomic profiling at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, AACR-GENIE v.13, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and 212 other studies, and examined according to KRASAMP status. We also correlated KRASAMP with KRAS RNA and protein expression using whole transcriptome and proteomics data from the TCGA and the Cancer Cell Lines Encyclopedia.
Results
Among 103,523 pts with solid and hematologic cancers, KRASAMP was identified in 1,744 (1.7%) of cases. KRASAMP was most prevalent in germ cell tumors (16.3%), esophagogastric (7.5%), ovarian (4.2%), pancreatic (2.2%), breast (2%), colorectal (CRC, 1.2%), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 1.2%). Among these pts, median age was 61, 61.5% were ever smokers, 85.4% were white, and 71.8% had poorly differentiated cancers. Compared to KRAS diploid cases, KRASAMP cancers had a higher fraction of the genome altered (p<0.01). Microsatellite instability scores were also higher in KRASAMP tumors from patients with breast, esophagogastric, germ cell, pancreatic and NSCLC (p<0.01), but not in CRC (p=0.22). Tumor mutational burden was higher (p<0.01) among CRC, NSCLC, and esophagogastric cancers with KRASAMP vs KRAS diploid. Compared to KRAS diploid samples, KRASAMP samples had increased KRAS mRNA (p<0.01) and protein expression (p<0.01). Among pts with clinical outcome data (N=41,900), median overall survival (OS) was shorter in all comers with KRASAMP vs KRAS diploid genotype (adjusted HR 1.68, p<0.01), and in each cancer type analyzed separately. KRASAMP conferred worse survival outcomes in pts with both KRAS wild-type (N=35,599, adjusted HR 1.38, p=0.01) and KRAS-mutant (N=6,301, adjusted HR 1.70, p<0.01) cancers.
Conclusions
KRAS amplification defines a novel subset of human cancers characterized by distinct genomic features, and worse survival. Novel therapeutic strategies to target KRASAMP may improve outcomes in pts with cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Biagio Ricciuti.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
B. Ricciuti: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Regeneron. P.A. Jänne: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting fees for advice on drug development: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Voronoi, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Sanofi, Takeda Oncology, Mirati Therapeutics, Trasncenta, Silicon Therapeutics, Syndax, Nuvalent, Bayer, Eisai, Allorion Therapeutics, Accutar Biotech, AbbVie, Duality Biologics; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting fees for advice on diagnostic development: Biocartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting fee for advice on drug development: Merus, Frontier Medicines; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting fees for advice on drug development: Hongyun Biotechnology; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Gatekeeper Pharmaceuticals, Allorion Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties, I receive post-marketing royalties from being an inventor on a DFCI owned patent on EGFR mutations licensed to Lab Corp: Lab Corp; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Sponsored research agreement with my institution: AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, PUMA, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Revolution Medicines, Takeda Oncology. M.M. Awad: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merk, BMS, AZ, Genentech, Nekter, Maverick, Blueprint Medicine, AbbVie, Gritstone, ArcherDX, Mirati; Financial Interests, Advisory Board: NextCure. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2263P - Ethnicity-specific distribution of BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 and ATM pathogenic alleles in breast and ovarian cancer patients from the North Caucasus
Presenter: Evgeny Imyanitov
Session: Poster session 08
2264P - Proteomics-based phenotypic classification of non-smallcell lung cancer
Presenter: Olena Berkovska
Session: Poster session 08
2265P - miR-4487 enhances gefitinib-mediated ubiquitination and autophagic degradation of EGFR in non-small cell lung cancer cells by targeting USP37
Presenter: Sei-Hoon Yang
Session: Poster session 08
2266P - IMMUcan consortium: Focus on the first results of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohort
Presenter: Marie Morfouace
Session: Poster session 08
2267P - Coronary heart disease and risk of lung cancer: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study
Presenter: Cai Chen Li
Session: Poster session 08
2269P - Patient derived xenografts generated from circulating cancer stem cells on chorioallantoic membrane as an alternative pre-clinical model for personalized medicine in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Monika Pizon
Session: Poster session 08
2270P - Integrative analyses of bulk and single-cell RNA-seq identified diabetes mellitus-related signature as a prognostic factor in pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Le Tang
Session: Poster session 08
2271P - Development of an oncolytic virus for the treatment of high grade serous ovarian cancer and other stromal rich tumours
Presenter: Miriam Bazan Peregrino
Session: Poster session 08
2272P - Minimal DNA-methylation (DNAm) signatures for non-invasive tumor-agnostic estimation of tumor content (TC) and molecular subtype in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC)
Presenter: Matteo Benelli
Session: Poster session 08
2273P - Influence of body mass index (BMI) on the response to chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ breast cancer: Role of the leptin axis
Presenter: Marta González Rodríguez
Session: Poster session 08