Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 08

2298P - Feasibility of ex vivo drug sensitivity testing in urothelial cancer: EVITA trial

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 08

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy;  Translational Research;  Targeted Therapy

Tumour Site

Urothelial Cancer

Presenters

Mathijs Scholtes

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S1152-S1189. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01927-0

Authors

M.P. Scholtes1, L. Ceton2, D. van der Meer2, F. Grillet2, M. Garcia Montero2, C.Z. Roeland3, E. Boevé4, J. Leijte5, H. Roshani6, G.J. van Leenders7, W. Vader2, J.L. Boormans3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute - Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CN - Rotterdam/NL
  • 2 R&d, VitroScan B.V, 2333 CH - Leiden/NL
  • 3 Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute - Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA - Rotterdam/NL
  • 4 Urology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland - Vlietland Hospital, 3118 JH - Schiedam/NL
  • 5 Urology, Amphia Ziekenhuis-location Molengracht, 4818 CK - Breda/NL
  • 6 Urology, Haga teaching hospital, The Hague/NL
  • 7 Pathology, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA - Rotterdam/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 2298P

Background

Patients with bladder cancer (BC) are treated with chemotherapy, either intravesically or systemically. Predictive biomarkers to guide clinical decision-making on chemotherapy are lacking, leading to potential ineffective treatment and toxicity. We hypothesized that an established ex vivo tumor testing assay could identify chemoresponsive BC prior to treatment and we performed a prospective feasibility trial (OZBS62.21051).

Methods

Fresh tumor tissue was collected and characterized by histological evaluation of H&E slides and hotspot mutation analysis of hTERT, FGFR3 and PIK3CA genes. For ex vivo drug testing, tumor clusters were isolated, seeded, and exposed to single-agent chemotherapy: carboplatin, cisplatin, gemcitabine and targeted therapy (erdafitinib). Sensitivity evaluation was performed by extraction of morphological features from high-throughput 3D imaging data, followed by AUC comparison of fitted dose-response curves.

Results

Ex vivo drug testing was successful for 28 out of 48 patients (58%), generating results within two weeks. Absence of muscle-invasiveness was key in assay success, with higher success in non-muscle invasive BC (NMIBC) (17/20, 85%, (OR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.7 – 9.1) than in muscle-invasive BC (11/28, 39%). The assay identified a subgroup of NMIBC patients with exceptional ex vivo gemcitabine response. Ex vivo sensitivity to FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib was observed in two patients with somatic FGFR3-Y375C mutations but not for FGFR3-WT patients (P = 0.03). Table: 2298P

Baseline characteristics (N=48)
Hospital (%)
Amphia 15 (31.2)
Erasmus MC 14 (29.2)
Haga 11 (22.9)
Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland 8 (16.7)
Age (median & range) 71 (42-96)
Sex (%)
Male 37 (77.1)
Female 11 (22.9)
Surgery (%)
TURBT 45 (93.7%)
Radical cystectomy 3 (6.3)
Invasion of musculus detrusor (%)
Yes 28 (58.3)
No 20 (41.7)
Tumor grade WHO 1973/2004 (%)
G2 (low grade) 4 (8.3)
G2 (high grade) 11 (22.9)
G3 33 (68.8)
Clinical tumor stage (%)
Ta 9 (18.8)
T1 12 (25)
T2 15 (31.3)
T3 10 (20.8)
T4 2 (4.2)
Clinical nodal stage (%)
N0 38 (79.2)
N1 3 (6.2)
N2 6 (12.5)
N3 1 (2.1)

Conclusions

We report the feasibility of ex vivo 3D tumor testing for BC. A correlation with clinical response to chemotherapy could not be established due to a lack of successfully screened patients with matching clinical chemotherapy treatment. For NMIBC, however, differential ex vivo sensitivity to gemcitabine, and a preliminary correlation for ex vivo erdafitinib sensitivity and FGFR3 mutation status offers a potential solution to select NMIBC patients for effective (novel) treatment options.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

PPP allowance: Health∼Holland (in cash), VitroScan B.V (in kind).

Disclosure

L. Ceton, D. van der Meer, F. Grillet, M. Garcia Montero: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: VitroScan B.V. W. Vader: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: VitroScan B.V; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: VitroScan B.V. J.L. Boormans: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Financially compensated role, Consultancy: Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Merck, MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Research collaboration: Janssen, Merck. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.