Abstract 2255P
Background
The recent development of direct KRAS inhibitors has changed the treatment landscape of patients (pts) with oncogenic KRAS mutations. However, whether KRAS amplification (KRASAMP) also defines a unique subset of cancers and represents a potential target for drug development is unknown.
Methods
Clinicogenomic data and outcomes were abstracted from independent cohorts of human cancers with genomic profiling at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, AACR-GENIE v.13, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and 212 other studies, and examined according to KRASAMP status. We also correlated KRASAMP with KRAS RNA and protein expression using whole transcriptome and proteomics data from the TCGA and the Cancer Cell Lines Encyclopedia.
Results
Among 103,523 pts with solid and hematologic cancers, KRASAMP was identified in 1,744 (1.7%) of cases. KRASAMP was most prevalent in germ cell tumors (16.3%), esophagogastric (7.5%), ovarian (4.2%), pancreatic (2.2%), breast (2%), colorectal (CRC, 1.2%), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 1.2%). Among these pts, median age was 61, 61.5% were ever smokers, 85.4% were white, and 71.8% had poorly differentiated cancers. Compared to KRAS diploid cases, KRASAMP cancers had a higher fraction of the genome altered (p<0.01). Microsatellite instability scores were also higher in KRASAMP tumors from patients with breast, esophagogastric, germ cell, pancreatic and NSCLC (p<0.01), but not in CRC (p=0.22). Tumor mutational burden was higher (p<0.01) among CRC, NSCLC, and esophagogastric cancers with KRASAMP vs KRAS diploid. Compared to KRAS diploid samples, KRASAMP samples had increased KRAS mRNA (p<0.01) and protein expression (p<0.01). Among pts with clinical outcome data (N=41,900), median overall survival (OS) was shorter in all comers with KRASAMP vs KRAS diploid genotype (adjusted HR 1.68, p<0.01), and in each cancer type analyzed separately. KRASAMP conferred worse survival outcomes in pts with both KRAS wild-type (N=35,599, adjusted HR 1.38, p=0.01) and KRAS-mutant (N=6,301, adjusted HR 1.70, p<0.01) cancers.
Conclusions
KRAS amplification defines a novel subset of human cancers characterized by distinct genomic features, and worse survival. Novel therapeutic strategies to target KRASAMP may improve outcomes in pts with cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Biagio Ricciuti.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
B. Ricciuti: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Regeneron. P.A. Jänne: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting fees for advice on drug development: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Voronoi, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Sanofi, Takeda Oncology, Mirati Therapeutics, Trasncenta, Silicon Therapeutics, Syndax, Nuvalent, Bayer, Eisai, Allorion Therapeutics, Accutar Biotech, AbbVie, Duality Biologics; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting fees for advice on diagnostic development: Biocartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting fee for advice on drug development: Merus, Frontier Medicines; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting fees for advice on drug development: Hongyun Biotechnology; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Gatekeeper Pharmaceuticals, Allorion Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties, I receive post-marketing royalties from being an inventor on a DFCI owned patent on EGFR mutations licensed to Lab Corp: Lab Corp; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Sponsored research agreement with my institution: AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, PUMA, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Revolution Medicines, Takeda Oncology. M.M. Awad: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merk, BMS, AZ, Genentech, Nekter, Maverick, Blueprint Medicine, AbbVie, Gritstone, ArcherDX, Mirati; Financial Interests, Advisory Board: NextCure. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2284P - Pre-clinical assessment of the therapeutic potential of a CD80-Fc-armed oncolytic virus (VSV-GP-CD80Fc)
Presenter: Andreas Ackermann
Session: Poster session 08
2285P - Lower response to COVID-19 booster dose vaccination on cancer patients comparing to healthy controls
Presenter: Pedro Cruz
Session: Poster session 08
2286P - COVID-19 vaccinations in cancer patients (pts): An individual participant data meta-analysis of the International Consortium on COVID vaccination in cancer
Presenter: Ha Mo Linh Le
Session: Poster session 08
2288P - Recolony-treating solid tumors with a bacteria-based approach
Presenter: Egle Katkeviciute
Session: Poster session 08
2289P - Determining anti-cancer efficacy of a reversible LSD1 inhibitor, EXS74539, in primary AML tissues with limited thrombocytopenic effects
Presenter: Christophe Boudesco
Session: Poster session 08
2291P - WU-NK-101, best in class memory-NK cell, has key features vital for adoptive cell therapy (ACT) in solid tumors (ST)
Presenter: John Muth
Session: Poster session 08
2292P - Prevalence of druggable EGFR genomic alterations in solid tumours other than lung cancer
Presenter: Tomohiro Kondo
Session: Poster session 08
2293P - Protumoral role of neutrophils and neutrophils extracellular traps (NETS) in non-metastatic gastroesophageal and rectal cancers
Presenter: Carlotta Catozzi
Session: Poster session 08
2294P - Whole genome sequencing to define the germline-somatic interaction in young-onset lung cancer
Presenter: Jaclyn LoPiccolo
Session: Poster session 08