Abstract 1140P
Background
The anti-PD1 antibody cemiplimab, is approved and recommended for patients with la/mCSCC based on a non-comparative pivotal study. In the absence of any prospective comparative study and to evaluate the extent of the benefit of cemiplimab versus previous therapies, the TOSCA study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of cemiplimab versus Historical Systemic Therapies (HST).
Methods
TOSCA is a large French retrospective, multicenter study in patients with laCSCC ineligible for curative surgery or radiation, or mCSCC, treated with cemiplimab via the Early Access Program (EAP) in 2018-2019, or with HST in 2013-2018 (NCT05302297). Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were PFS, DOR, ORR, and safety. Only immunocompetent patients meeting the strict indication of the EAP were considered for effectiveness analysis using inverse probability weighting method (IPW). All patients were considered for safety analysis.
Results
A total of 280 patients were included in the study (cemiplimab, n=147 and HST, n=133) and 199 patients were considered for effectiveness analysis (cemiplimab, n=129 and HST, n=70). The median age was 81 (range 48–99) and 78 (52–93) years; males were 70% and 73% for cemiplimab and HST arms, respectively. 60% and 73% of patients had mCSCC, and 50% and 31% of patients received at least one previous systemic therapy in cemiplimab and HST arms. With a median follow-up of 20 and 10 months for cemiplimab and HST arms, and after controlling for confounding using IPW, the median OS was 21 and 10 months (hazard ratio [HR] [95%CI]: 0.57 [0.45-0.73]; P-value <0.0001), respectively. The median PFS was 14 and 5 months (HR [95%CI]: 0.57 [0.43-0.76]; P-value = 0.0001). The median DOR was 22 and 5 months (HR [95%CI]: 0.58 [0.30-1.12]; P-value = 0.1033). The ORR was 57% in cemiplimab group and 33% in HST group (P-value <0.001) including 30% and 15% of complete response, respectively. Adverse drug reactions of all grades were documented in 27% (cemiplimab) and 33% (HST) of patients.
Conclusions
TOSCA is the first comparative study in CSCC and showed significantly longer outcomes in patients treated with cemiplimab versus HST, confirming its benefits in patients with la/mCSCCs.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05302297.
Editorial acknowledgement
Padmanabham Salla, Sanofi Global Hub.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sanofi.
Funding
Sanofi.
Disclosure
E. Gerard: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pierre Fabre, BMS, Novartis, MSD Oncology. C. Lebbe: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or advisory role: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Roche, Merck Serono, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre; Other, Personal, Other, Other relationship: Avantis Medical Systems, InflaRx, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Jazz Pharmaceuticals; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Incyte; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Funding: Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb. E. Lanoy: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or advisory role: Sanofi, Novartis. M. Viguier: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or advisory role: AbbVie, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly O., Boehringer Ingelheim. N. Meyer: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or advisory role: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Merckle GmbH; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology. L. Mortier: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Sun Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or advisory role: BMS GmbH & Co. KG, Sun Pharma, Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: MSD Oncology, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb. M. Dinulescu: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Honoraria: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Sanofi. D. Legoupil: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or advisory role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, MSD Oncology; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pierre Fabre, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology. E.M. Neidhardt: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or advisory role: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pierre Fabre. P. Saiag: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or advisory role: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Pierre Fabre. C. Nardin: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or advisory role: Sanofi. E. Maubec: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or advisory role: Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: MSD Oncology, Pierre Fabre, Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: MSD. E. Hainaut Wierzbicka: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, AbbVie, Novartis, Sun Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Sanofi: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, AbbVie, Sun Pharma, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: AbbVie; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie, Novartis. S. Perrier, S. Garnier: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Sanofi employee may hold company stock/stock options: Sanofi. C. Robert: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Consulting or advisory role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, MSD, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Stock and Other Ownership Interests: RiboNexus; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Novartis, Phio Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1109P - Second-line pembrolizumab (pembro) in Chinese patients (pts) with advanced melanoma: Long-term follow-up of the phase I KEYNOTE-151 study
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster session 13
1110P - A phase II clinical trial of SHR-1701 combined with temozolomide for advanced melanoma
Presenter: Tu Hu
Session: Poster session 13
1111P - A randomised phase II study of intermittent versus continuous dosing of targeted therapy in patients with BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma (INTERIM)
Presenter: Avinash Gupta
Session: Poster session 13
1112P - Five-year survival after intermittent targeted therapy and anti-PD1 in stage IV melanoma: An update of the IMPemBra trial
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1113P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (enco) + binimetinib (bini) vs vemurafenib (vemu) or enco in patients (pts) with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 13
1114P - Encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) in unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma, real-world evidence in Spain (GEM 2002 - BECARE)
Presenter: Ainara Soria Rivas
Session: Poster session 13
1115P - Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of dabrafenib/trametinib versus vemurafenib/cobimetinib therapy in routine medical practice: Eight years of BRAF/MEK inhibitor use in routine clinical practice
Presenter: Karolina Piejko
Session: Poster session 13
1116P - Long term outcome of complete responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or target therapy (TT) in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster session 13
1117P - Overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI): Comparing real-world vs clinical trial data
Presenter: Gino In
Session: Poster session 13
1118P - Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with BRAF+ metastatic melanoma refractory to first-line immunotherapy
Presenter: Thach-Giao Truong
Session: Poster session 13