Abstract 1964P
Background
Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models can recapitulate the native tumour microenvironment (TME) of cancers. However, data on the biomimicry of 3D osteosarcoma (OS) models is unclear. This scoping review (SR) aims to assess how the biomimicry of 3D OS models changes depending on the engineered features of the model. Biomimicry was determined by studying multiple parameters, including cell behaviour and drug resistance.
Methods
The scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included studies with 3D culture models using osteosarcoma cells. The systematic search, which involved five databases (January 2012-December 2022), identified 293 studies; 70 studies were selected for final analysis: 40 involved drug screening, and 21 included the addition of stromal cells into the model.
Results
Overall, 64% of 3D OS models were scaffold-based compared to self-generated spheroid models. Native scaffolds (42%) comprising mainly collagen/hydroxyapatite predominated, followed by composite scaffolds (22%). For drug screening, both scaffold-based and scaffold-free models were used equally. Thirteen of 15 studies comparing 3D versus 2D drug sensitivity showed decreased sensitivity in 3D models, with several studies showing upregulated resistance genes in 3D models. Furthermore, the use of ECM-mimetic scaffolds and native biomaterials enhanced resistance by OS cells. These suggest biomimetic 3D OS models better recapitulate in vivo TME for drug screening. Co-cultures of OS/stroma cells enhanced biomimicry of 3D models and contributed towards osteogenic differentiation, ECM remodelling, mineralisation, angiogenesis, and OS-stromal cells’ crosstalk. Seven studies demonstrated selective toxicity of chemotherapeutics towards OS cells while sparing stromal cells, providing helpful evidence for novel therapies development.
Conclusions
This SR highlights the biomimicry of 3D OS models in recapitulating in vivo TME. Future work should explore innovative 3D biomimetic models, biomaterials, and advancements in personalised medicine.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1971P - Metastatic osteosarcoma, patterns of care and outcomes of patients in a real-life setting: The Metabone national observational study
Presenter: Mathilde Reich
Session: Poster session 15
1972P - Molecular mechanism study of recurrence/metastasis for Enneking IIb osteosarcoma
Presenter: Junqiang Yin
Session: Poster session 15
1975P - Systemic therapy for KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GIST
Presenter: Mehdi Brahmi
Session: Poster session 15
1976P - Financial difficulties experienced by gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients in the Netherlands: Data from a cross-sectional multicenter study
Presenter: Deborah van de Wal
Session: Poster session 15
1977P - A registry-based analysis of the projected genomic landscape among unclassified KIT/PDGFRA wildtype mutations in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Presenter: Jerry Call
Session: Poster session 15
1978P - Identification of SDH-deficient GIST increases after the implementation of diagnostic algorithm in Life Raft Group (LRG) patient registry data
Presenter: Denisse Evans
Session: Poster session 15
1979P - phase I trial of pembrolizumab in HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma (KS)
Presenter: Kathryn Lurain
Session: Poster session 15
1980P - Artificial intelligence analysis shows enhanced CCNG1 expression in sarcoma tumors, a novel biomarker for DeltaRex-G tumor targeted retrovector encoding a CCNG1 inhibitor gene
Presenter: Sant Chawla
Session: Poster session 15
1981P - Histopathological diagnostic discrepancies in bone and soft tissue tumors referred to a specialist sarcoma center and its clinical impact
Presenter: Akira Kawai
Session: Poster session 15