Abstract 1964P
Background
Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models can recapitulate the native tumour microenvironment (TME) of cancers. However, data on the biomimicry of 3D osteosarcoma (OS) models is unclear. This scoping review (SR) aims to assess how the biomimicry of 3D OS models changes depending on the engineered features of the model. Biomimicry was determined by studying multiple parameters, including cell behaviour and drug resistance.
Methods
The scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included studies with 3D culture models using osteosarcoma cells. The systematic search, which involved five databases (January 2012-December 2022), identified 293 studies; 70 studies were selected for final analysis: 40 involved drug screening, and 21 included the addition of stromal cells into the model.
Results
Overall, 64% of 3D OS models were scaffold-based compared to self-generated spheroid models. Native scaffolds (42%) comprising mainly collagen/hydroxyapatite predominated, followed by composite scaffolds (22%). For drug screening, both scaffold-based and scaffold-free models were used equally. Thirteen of 15 studies comparing 3D versus 2D drug sensitivity showed decreased sensitivity in 3D models, with several studies showing upregulated resistance genes in 3D models. Furthermore, the use of ECM-mimetic scaffolds and native biomaterials enhanced resistance by OS cells. These suggest biomimetic 3D OS models better recapitulate in vivo TME for drug screening. Co-cultures of OS/stroma cells enhanced biomimicry of 3D models and contributed towards osteogenic differentiation, ECM remodelling, mineralisation, angiogenesis, and OS-stromal cells’ crosstalk. Seven studies demonstrated selective toxicity of chemotherapeutics towards OS cells while sparing stromal cells, providing helpful evidence for novel therapies development.
Conclusions
This SR highlights the biomimicry of 3D OS models in recapitulating in vivo TME. Future work should explore innovative 3D biomimetic models, biomaterials, and advancements in personalised medicine.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1959P - Clinicopathological features and survival analysis of orbital rhabdomyosarcoma
Presenter: Fatma Elawady
Session: Poster session 15
1960P - Clinical outcomes of the patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma developed brain metastasis
Presenter: Yu Toda
Session: Poster session 15
1961P - Prevalence of diagnostic discrepancies in soft tissue and bone tumors from initial diagnosis to referral center
Presenter: Khomsit Thongthammachat
Session: Poster session 15
1963P - Comprehensive profiling of chordoma reveals tumor microenvironment subtypes and unique molecular findings
Presenter: Marina Voropaeva
Session: Poster session 15
1965P - Transcriptional analysis of immune microenvironment of chordomas of the skull base and mobile spine
Presenter: Jason Roszik
Session: Poster session 15
1966P - Extending the interval of denosumab treatment for unresectable giant cell tumor of bone
Presenter: Toshiyuki Kunisada
Session: Poster session 15
1967P - A single-arm multicenter trial of the combination of anlotinib with chemotherapy in patients with stage IIb classic osteosarcoma of the extremity
Presenter: Fan Tang
Session: Poster session 15
1968P - Metastatic Ewing sarcoma, patterns of care and outcomes of patients in a real-life setting: The Metabone national observational study
Presenter: coline ducrot
Session: Poster session 15
1969P - Intratumoral immune infiltrates in chondrosarcoma (ChS)
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster session 15
1970P - Metastatic chondrosarcoma, patterns of care and outcomes of patients in a real-life setting: The Metabone national observational study
Presenter: coline ducrot
Session: Poster session 15