Abstract 1964P
Background
Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models can recapitulate the native tumour microenvironment (TME) of cancers. However, data on the biomimicry of 3D osteosarcoma (OS) models is unclear. This scoping review (SR) aims to assess how the biomimicry of 3D OS models changes depending on the engineered features of the model. Biomimicry was determined by studying multiple parameters, including cell behaviour and drug resistance.
Methods
The scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included studies with 3D culture models using osteosarcoma cells. The systematic search, which involved five databases (January 2012-December 2022), identified 293 studies; 70 studies were selected for final analysis: 40 involved drug screening, and 21 included the addition of stromal cells into the model.
Results
Overall, 64% of 3D OS models were scaffold-based compared to self-generated spheroid models. Native scaffolds (42%) comprising mainly collagen/hydroxyapatite predominated, followed by composite scaffolds (22%). For drug screening, both scaffold-based and scaffold-free models were used equally. Thirteen of 15 studies comparing 3D versus 2D drug sensitivity showed decreased sensitivity in 3D models, with several studies showing upregulated resistance genes in 3D models. Furthermore, the use of ECM-mimetic scaffolds and native biomaterials enhanced resistance by OS cells. These suggest biomimetic 3D OS models better recapitulate in vivo TME for drug screening. Co-cultures of OS/stroma cells enhanced biomimicry of 3D models and contributed towards osteogenic differentiation, ECM remodelling, mineralisation, angiogenesis, and OS-stromal cells’ crosstalk. Seven studies demonstrated selective toxicity of chemotherapeutics towards OS cells while sparing stromal cells, providing helpful evidence for novel therapies development.
Conclusions
This SR highlights the biomimicry of 3D OS models in recapitulating in vivo TME. Future work should explore innovative 3D biomimetic models, biomaterials, and advancements in personalised medicine.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1949P - Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) combined with trabectedin as a treatment option in uterine sarcomas
Presenter: Laura Strobel
Session: Poster session 15
1950P - A single-arm, phase II clinical trial of neoadjuvant pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus anlotinib in locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma
Presenter: Yong Chen
Session: Poster session 15
1951P - Propranolol monotherapy in angiosarcoma: A window-of-opportunity study (PropAngio)
Presenter: Alaa Embaby
Session: Poster session 15
1952P - Efficacy and safety of utidelone in previously treated patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (HX-SARC02): A prospective, single-arm, phase II study
Presenter: yu jiang
Session: Poster session 15
1953P - Prognostic value of pretreatment inflammatory markers and other clinicopathological factors for early recurrence in soft tissue sarcoma
Presenter: Pia Van Der Laan
Session: Poster session 15
1954P - The risk of second primary gastrointestinal tract GIT malignancy after primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma
Presenter: Bushra Alshaikh
Session: Poster session 15
1955P - Distinguishing lipomas from atypical lipomatous tumors/well differentiated liposarcomas in histology slides using deep learning
Presenter: Marie karanian
Session: Poster session 15
1956P - Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma: NASAR prospective study
Presenter: Jeronimo Martinez-Garcia
Session: Poster session 15
1957P - Results from a phase I/II trial of tinostamustine monotherapy in advanced solid tumours (NCT03345485): Safety and efficacy in a subset of patients (pts) with soft tissue sarcoma (STS)
Presenter: Rashmi Chugh
Session: Poster session 15
1958P - Head and neck soft tissue sarcoma: Evaluation of the 8th AJCC as a prognostic tool for patients treated with curative intent in a multidisciplinary cancer center
Presenter: Giulia Zanetta
Session: Poster session 15