Abstract 543P
Background
Various systemic treatments for recurrent meningiomas (MEN) have been investigated with controversial results. We analyzed and compared the role of bevacizumab (BEV) and hydroxyurea (HYD).
Methods
Retrospectively, we analyzed recurrent grade 2 and 3 MEN PTS receiving BEV or HYD at the Veneto Institute of Oncology (Padua, Italy) from Nov 2011 to March 2023. All pts were not more amenable for surgery or RT. NGS data (Foundation One) were also collected. Kaplan-Meier curves were for survival rate; RANO criteria were used for radiological assessment.
Results
31 pts in the BEV cohort were included. Baseline data for the BEV cohort were: 13 (41.9%) female pts; 17 (54.8%) below 65 years old; 16 (51.6%) PS ECOG <2; ≤2 previous surgeries in 17 (54%); 28 (90.3%) with less than 2 previous treatments. BEV was administered at 5 or 10 mg/Kg q2w or 7.5 mg/Kg q3w schedule. 13 pts were included in the HYD cohort. Baseline data for the HYD cohort were: 9 (69%) female pts; 5 (38%) < 65 years old; 6 (46%) ECOG PS <2; ≤2 previous surgeries in 8 (61%); 1 (8%) previously treated. HYD was administered at 1000 mg/day. Pts affected by NF2 were 1 (8%) in HYD cohort and 2 (6%) in the BEV cohort. Pts treated with BEV achieved a DCR of 86.7%; mPFS was 19.6ms [95%CI: 10.6-NA]; 6m-PFS rate was 84.6% [95% CI 71.6-99.8]; mOS was 16.1ms [95%CI: 11.4-NA]; median follow up was 17.5ms. Pts treated with HYD achieved a DCR of 53.8 %; mPFS 5.6ms [95%CI: 2.9-NA]; 6m PFS 49.4% [95% CI 27.4-88.9]; mOS 22.6ms [95%CI: 12.3-NA]; median follow up was 117,1ms. Difference in OS was not statistically significant (p-value 0.8256), but difference in PFS was statistically significant (p-value 0.0026). NGS data were available for 22 pts (71%) of the BEV cohort; NF2 mutations were detected in 14 (63.63%); PTEN loss/mutation in 3 (9.67%); FGFR, JAK, ALK each in 1 case (3.2%).
Conclusions
BEV can be considered a useful therapeutic option to control disease in recurrent MEN pts although it appears not to impact survival compared to HYD. Further analyses on predictive biomarkers of efficacy is needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
IRCCS Istituto Oncologico Veneto.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
592P - The role of early change in circulating tumor DNA as a potential predictor of response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Jinjia Chang
Session: Poster session 10
594P - The efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy for RAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with RAS mutation negative in circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) after 1st- or 2nd-line chemotherapy
Presenter: Naoki Izawa
Session: Poster session 10
595P - The DUREC trial: Durvalumab plus total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer - a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study (GEMCAD-1703)
Presenter: Jaume Capdevila Castillon
Session: Poster session 10
597P - Surgical quality for patients (pts) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): PROSPECT (NCCTG N1048, alliance)
Presenter: Martin Weiser
Session: Poster session 10
598P - Influence of the early stoma closure after low rectal cancer resection on completeness of adjuvant chemotherapy (CoCStom): A randomized, controlled multicentre trial of the AIO (AIO KRK 0113)
Presenter: Flavius Sandra-Petrescu
Session: Poster session 10
599P - R-IMMUNE: A phase Ib/II study to evaluate safety and efficacy of atezolizumab combined with radio-chemotherapy in a preoperative setting for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)
Presenter: Javier Carrasco
Session: Poster session 10