Abstract 543P
Background
Various systemic treatments for recurrent meningiomas (MEN) have been investigated with controversial results. We analyzed and compared the role of bevacizumab (BEV) and hydroxyurea (HYD).
Methods
Retrospectively, we analyzed recurrent grade 2 and 3 MEN PTS receiving BEV or HYD at the Veneto Institute of Oncology (Padua, Italy) from Nov 2011 to March 2023. All pts were not more amenable for surgery or RT. NGS data (Foundation One) were also collected. Kaplan-Meier curves were for survival rate; RANO criteria were used for radiological assessment.
Results
31 pts in the BEV cohort were included. Baseline data for the BEV cohort were: 13 (41.9%) female pts; 17 (54.8%) below 65 years old; 16 (51.6%) PS ECOG <2; ≤2 previous surgeries in 17 (54%); 28 (90.3%) with less than 2 previous treatments. BEV was administered at 5 or 10 mg/Kg q2w or 7.5 mg/Kg q3w schedule. 13 pts were included in the HYD cohort. Baseline data for the HYD cohort were: 9 (69%) female pts; 5 (38%) < 65 years old; 6 (46%) ECOG PS <2; ≤2 previous surgeries in 8 (61%); 1 (8%) previously treated. HYD was administered at 1000 mg/day. Pts affected by NF2 were 1 (8%) in HYD cohort and 2 (6%) in the BEV cohort. Pts treated with BEV achieved a DCR of 86.7%; mPFS was 19.6ms [95%CI: 10.6-NA]; 6m-PFS rate was 84.6% [95% CI 71.6-99.8]; mOS was 16.1ms [95%CI: 11.4-NA]; median follow up was 17.5ms. Pts treated with HYD achieved a DCR of 53.8 %; mPFS 5.6ms [95%CI: 2.9-NA]; 6m PFS 49.4% [95% CI 27.4-88.9]; mOS 22.6ms [95%CI: 12.3-NA]; median follow up was 117,1ms. Difference in OS was not statistically significant (p-value 0.8256), but difference in PFS was statistically significant (p-value 0.0026). NGS data were available for 22 pts (71%) of the BEV cohort; NF2 mutations were detected in 14 (63.63%); PTEN loss/mutation in 3 (9.67%); FGFR, JAK, ALK each in 1 case (3.2%).
Conclusions
BEV can be considered a useful therapeutic option to control disease in recurrent MEN pts although it appears not to impact survival compared to HYD. Further analyses on predictive biomarkers of efficacy is needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
IRCCS Istituto Oncologico Veneto.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
571P - Artificial intelligence-powered analysis of tumor lymphocytes infiltration: A translational analysis of AtezoTRIBE trial
Presenter: Martina Carullo
Session: Poster session 10
572P - Neoantigen heterogeneity among subtypes in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Fuqiang Li
Session: Poster session 10
574P - Comparative analysis of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in primary and metastatic sites of microsatellite stable (MSS) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI) colorectal cancer
Presenter: Marwan Fakih
Session: Poster session 10
575P - Impact of immunological alterations and post-operative biomarkers on long-term outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: Results from the STAR-01 study cohort
Presenter: Francesca Negri
Session: Poster session 10
576P - Prognostic values of a modified diagnostic biopsy-adapted immunoscore based on double immunohistochemical staining in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
Presenter: Qiang Zeng
Session: Poster session 10
577P - Systematically assessing the intratissue microbiota in 937 patients with colorectal cancer
Presenter: Huanzi Zhong
Session: Poster session 10
578P - Tissue-resident microbiota characterization in colorectal cancer metastases
Presenter: Philippe Stevens
Session: Poster session 10
579P - A clinico-imaging predictive artificial intelligence model of relapse in colon cancer using baseline CT scans
Presenter: América Bueno Gómez
Session: Poster session 10
580P - Prognosis in stage II colorectal cancer: The effect of the primary tumor location and biomarkers
Presenter: Vincent Liégeois
Session: Poster session 10