Abstract 543P
Background
Various systemic treatments for recurrent meningiomas (MEN) have been investigated with controversial results. We analyzed and compared the role of bevacizumab (BEV) and hydroxyurea (HYD).
Methods
Retrospectively, we analyzed recurrent grade 2 and 3 MEN PTS receiving BEV or HYD at the Veneto Institute of Oncology (Padua, Italy) from Nov 2011 to March 2023. All pts were not more amenable for surgery or RT. NGS data (Foundation One) were also collected. Kaplan-Meier curves were for survival rate; RANO criteria were used for radiological assessment.
Results
31 pts in the BEV cohort were included. Baseline data for the BEV cohort were: 13 (41.9%) female pts; 17 (54.8%) below 65 years old; 16 (51.6%) PS ECOG <2; ≤2 previous surgeries in 17 (54%); 28 (90.3%) with less than 2 previous treatments. BEV was administered at 5 or 10 mg/Kg q2w or 7.5 mg/Kg q3w schedule. 13 pts were included in the HYD cohort. Baseline data for the HYD cohort were: 9 (69%) female pts; 5 (38%) < 65 years old; 6 (46%) ECOG PS <2; ≤2 previous surgeries in 8 (61%); 1 (8%) previously treated. HYD was administered at 1000 mg/day. Pts affected by NF2 were 1 (8%) in HYD cohort and 2 (6%) in the BEV cohort. Pts treated with BEV achieved a DCR of 86.7%; mPFS was 19.6ms [95%CI: 10.6-NA]; 6m-PFS rate was 84.6% [95% CI 71.6-99.8]; mOS was 16.1ms [95%CI: 11.4-NA]; median follow up was 17.5ms. Pts treated with HYD achieved a DCR of 53.8 %; mPFS 5.6ms [95%CI: 2.9-NA]; 6m PFS 49.4% [95% CI 27.4-88.9]; mOS 22.6ms [95%CI: 12.3-NA]; median follow up was 117,1ms. Difference in OS was not statistically significant (p-value 0.8256), but difference in PFS was statistically significant (p-value 0.0026). NGS data were available for 22 pts (71%) of the BEV cohort; NF2 mutations were detected in 14 (63.63%); PTEN loss/mutation in 3 (9.67%); FGFR, JAK, ALK each in 1 case (3.2%).
Conclusions
BEV can be considered a useful therapeutic option to control disease in recurrent MEN pts although it appears not to impact survival compared to HYD. Further analyses on predictive biomarkers of efficacy is needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
IRCCS Istituto Oncologico Veneto.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
518P - Artificial intelligence real-world applications in pediatric neuro-oncology: The AICCELERATE project
Presenter: Federica D'Antonio
Session: Poster session 10
519P - The landscape of PDGFRA mutation in Chinese patients with glioma
Presenter: Qiang Lv
Session: Poster session 10
520P - Copy number variation spectrum analysis of primary glioblastoma
Presenter: Chuandong Cheng
Session: Poster session 10
521P - Deciphering a three-miRNA signature as a prognostic biomarker in glioma patients: Correlation with DFS and OS
Presenter: Ana Belen Diaz Mendez
Session: Poster session 10
522P - Galectin 3 binding protein as potential biomarker in glioma diagnosis
Presenter: Rashmi Rana
Session: Poster session 10
523P - Analysis of DNA damage response (DDR) gene expression as a prognostic factor for glioblastoma patient mortality
Presenter: Alessia-Tara Droesse
Session: Poster session 10
524P - Cell line study of nucleosome-based biomarkers in the diagnosis and detection of relapses in glioblastoma
Presenter: Jonathan Decarpentrie
Session: Poster session 10
525P - Immuno markers in newly glioblastoma patients underwent Stupp protocol after neurosurgery
Presenter: Lorena Gurrieri
Session: Poster session 10
526P - In silico evaluation of the mutational profile of glioblastomas with high expression of PD1, CTLA4 and LAG3 identifies the ERBB-PI3K pathway as a druggable vulnerability target
Presenter: Cristina Saiz-Ladera
Session: Poster session 10
527P - Targetable gene fusions and other alterations in central nervous system tumors assessed by RNA and DNA-based next-generation sequencing
Presenter: LEIMING WANG
Session: Poster session 10