Abstract 123P
Background
HER2 is overexpressed in a subset of BTC patients, and recent developments in HER2-targeted agents are expanding therapeutic options. However, accurately assessing HER2 expression is challenging in BTC, especially at a low-expression level. We evaluated HER2 expression as well as TILs density through AI models in BTC.
Methods
Whole-slide images (WSI) of pre-treatment HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides, matched H&E-stained slides and clinicopathological data were obtained from advanced or metastatic BTC patients at CHA Bundang Medical Center in South Korea, between 2019 and 2022. An AI-powered HER2 analyzer classifies tumor cells by HER2 staining intensity (H0, H1, H2, or H3) and quantifies the cells in each staining category. Then, it calculates HER2 categories (0/1+/2+/3+) following the latest ASCO/CAP HER2 IHC guidelines. For evaluating immune landscape, a separate WSI analyzer identified and quantified. TILs within the cancer epithelium or stroma from H&E-stained slides.
Results
In a total of 328 patients, the AI-scored HER2 categories were 0 in 92 (28.9%), 1+ in 137 (43.1%), 2+ in 68 (21.4%), and 3+ in 21 (6.6%). The overall concordance of HER2 categories between the AI and pathologists’ readings was 75.3%. HER2 3+ rates by AI in intrahepatic, extrahepatic, gallbladder, and Ampulla of Vater are estimated to be 3.1%, 3.4%, 21.4%, and 5.9%, respectively. HER2-expressing tumors (1+, 2+, and 3+) have significantly higher densities of stromal TILs (983.2 ± 1347.5 / mm2) than HER2-negative tumors (683.5 ± 739.7 / mm2, p=0.012) and there were no significant TIL density differences between HER2-high expressing (3+) and low expressing tumors (1+, 2+), which were consistent with either by the AI or pathologists.
Conclusions
AI-powered HER2 scoring showed good agreement with pathologists’ scoring, and HER2-expressing tumors harbored high stromal TIL in BTC. Objective expression analysis and the associated differences in immunogenicity will be important for future treatment strategies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Lunit Inc.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
97P - Neoadjuvant durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (D+GemCis) versus gemcis alone for localized biliary tract cancer (BTC): Results of a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II trial (DEBATE)
Presenter: Changhoon Yoo
Session: Poster session 17
101P - Quality of life (QoL) outcomes in patients (pts) with zanidatamab (zani)-treated HER2-positive (HER2+) biliary tract cancer (BTC) in the phase IIb HERIZON-BTC-01 study
Presenter: Harpreet Wasan
Session: Poster session 17
102P - Potentially prognostic factors of overall survival in advanced biliary tract cancer in the randomised phase III TOPAZ-1 study
Presenter: Aiwu Ruth He
Session: Poster session 17
103P - Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised trials to compare efficacy of second-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC)
Presenter: Jaewon Hyung
Session: Poster session 17
104P - Final analysis of the prospective, randomized phase II STAMP trial: Adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) versus capecitabine (CAP) in node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA)
Presenter: Hyehyun Jeong
Session: Poster session 17
105P - A phase II study of SHR-1316 plus IBI310 in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after failure of first-line therapy
Presenter: Jia Fan
Session: Poster session 17