Abstract 123P
Background
HER2 is overexpressed in a subset of BTC patients, and recent developments in HER2-targeted agents are expanding therapeutic options. However, accurately assessing HER2 expression is challenging in BTC, especially at a low-expression level. We evaluated HER2 expression as well as TILs density through AI models in BTC.
Methods
Whole-slide images (WSI) of pre-treatment HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides, matched H&E-stained slides and clinicopathological data were obtained from advanced or metastatic BTC patients at CHA Bundang Medical Center in South Korea, between 2019 and 2022. An AI-powered HER2 analyzer classifies tumor cells by HER2 staining intensity (H0, H1, H2, or H3) and quantifies the cells in each staining category. Then, it calculates HER2 categories (0/1+/2+/3+) following the latest ASCO/CAP HER2 IHC guidelines. For evaluating immune landscape, a separate WSI analyzer identified and quantified. TILs within the cancer epithelium or stroma from H&E-stained slides.
Results
In a total of 328 patients, the AI-scored HER2 categories were 0 in 92 (28.9%), 1+ in 137 (43.1%), 2+ in 68 (21.4%), and 3+ in 21 (6.6%). The overall concordance of HER2 categories between the AI and pathologists’ readings was 75.3%. HER2 3+ rates by AI in intrahepatic, extrahepatic, gallbladder, and Ampulla of Vater are estimated to be 3.1%, 3.4%, 21.4%, and 5.9%, respectively. HER2-expressing tumors (1+, 2+, and 3+) have significantly higher densities of stromal TILs (983.2 ± 1347.5 / mm2) than HER2-negative tumors (683.5 ± 739.7 / mm2, p=0.012) and there were no significant TIL density differences between HER2-high expressing (3+) and low expressing tumors (1+, 2+), which were consistent with either by the AI or pathologists.
Conclusions
AI-powered HER2 scoring showed good agreement with pathologists’ scoring, and HER2-expressing tumors harbored high stromal TIL in BTC. Objective expression analysis and the associated differences in immunogenicity will be important for future treatment strategies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Lunit Inc.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
690P - Ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd; DS-7300) in patients with advanced solid tumors: Updated clinical and biomarker results from a phase I/II study
Presenter: Manish R Patel
Session: Poster session 17
691P - Efficacy of ABBV-400 monotherapy in patients with MET gene amplified advanced solid tumors
Presenter: John Strickler
Session: Poster session 17
692P - First-in-human study of ELU001, a targeted nanoparticle drug conjugate, in subjects with folate receptor α (FRα) overexpressing solid tumors
Presenter: Wen wee Ma
Session: Poster session 17
693P - Preclinical activity of HLX43, a PD-L1-targeting ADC, in multiple PD-1/PD-L1 refractory/resistant models
Presenter: Yongqiang Shan
Session: Poster session 17
694P - Full efficacy analysis of phase I/II trial investigating bexmarilimab, a novel macrophage-guided immunotherapy in refractory solid tumors
Presenter: Petri Bono
Session: Poster session 17
695P - A phase I/Ib study evaluating the safety and tolerability of NIZ985 alone and in combination with spartalizumab (anti–PD-1) in patients (pts) with solid tumors or lymphoma
Presenter: Elena Garralda
Session: Poster session 17
696P - SIM1811-03 (SIM0235), an anti-tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 (TNFR2) monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumor and/or cutaneous T cell lymphomas (CTCL): Preliminary results from an on-going first-in-human phase I trial in China
Presenter: Furong Liu
Session: Poster session 17
699P - Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in long-survivor (LS) patients with metastatic lung cancer (mLC) after primary immunization (PV) and booster (BD): COVALENCE study
Presenter: Emanuele Vita
Session: Poster session 17