Abstract 1561P
Background
Recently, we reported safety and efficacy of T-mab plus N-mab with S-1/Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (UMIN000034222). The aim of this study was to explore a candidate biomarker for this new combination therapy.
Methods
Patients were treated with S-1 80 mg/m2/day or Capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day on days 1-14 with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2, N-mab 360mg, and T-mab 8mg/kg for initial treatment, and subsequently with 6 mg/kg on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. Pre-treatment primary tumor samples were collected for whole exome sequencing (WES).
Results
42 patients enrolled in this clinical trial, and WES was performed on 23 patients. In the copy number analysis, ERBB2 amp. was observed most frequently in 15 patients (65%). Subsequently, GATA6, MYC and CCNE1 amp. were observed in 8 (35%), 6 (26%), and 5 (22%) patients, respectively. In the mutation analysis, TP53 was observed most frequently in 20 patients (87%). Subsequently, mutations in APC, ERBB3, and PIK3CA were observed in 6 (26%), 3 (13%), and 3 (13%) patients, respectively. Among them, APC mut., MYC, and GATA6 amp. were associated with worse survival. Patients with APC mut. showed significantly shorter PFS (median 5.6 vs 20.8 months, HR 3.47, 95%CI 1.16-10.44, p = 0.018), but not for OS (median 21.0 vs 26.5 months, HR 1.19, 95%CI 0.31-4.60, p = 0.806). Patients with MYC amp. showed significantly shorter PFS (median 4.2 vs 18.0 months, HR 3.48, 95%CI 1.09-11.12, p = 0.024) and OS (median 13.9 months vs not reached, HR 3.97, 95%CI 0.95-16.54, p = 0.042), respectively. Patients with GATA6 amp. showed significantly shorter PFS (median 5.8 vs 32.0 months, HR 3.53, 95%CI 1.25-9.99, p = 0.011) and OS (median 13.9 months vs not reached, HR 3.74, 95%CI 1.04-13.40, p = 0.030). As for objective response rates (ORRs), patients with APC mut. and MYC amp. showed lower response rates (50% vs 82% for APC mut., 67% vs 77% for MYC amp.), whereas comparable ORR was shown for GATA6 amp. (75% vs 73 %).
Conclusions
APC mut., MYC, and GATA6 amp. may have negative clinical impacts on the effects of the new combination therapy including T-mab and N-mab.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
K. Chin: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Taiho Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co.Ltd., Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Merck & Co., Inc. K. Minashi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, Taiho, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Astellas Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd,. H. Hara: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Ono, Bayer, Chugai, Lilly, Merck Biopharma, Taiho, Takeda, Yakult, Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo, Janssen, Merck Biopharma, MSD, Ono, Taiho, ALX oncology. K. Kato: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck and Co; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck and Co, Bayer, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Taiho, Merck Biophrma, Amgen, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Ono Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Bayer, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Chugai, Taiho, Oncolys Biopharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical. N. Boku: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Takeda Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical. K. Yamaguchi: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Taiho; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono, Eli Lilly Japan; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Taiho. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1521P - Addition of durvalumab to CROSS in oesophageal adenocarcinoma is feasible and safe
Presenter: Hans Schloesser
Session: Poster session 21
1523P - Phase II dose optimization results from MOUNTAINEER-02: A study of tucatinib, trastuzumab, ramucirumab, and paclitaxel for HER2+ gastroesophageal cancer (GEC)
Presenter: Mustapha Tehfe
Session: Poster session 21
1524P - First-line TST001 plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for advanced G/GEJ cancer with CLDN18.2 positive overall survival data from study transtar102-Cohort C
Presenter: Lin Shen
Session: Poster session 21
1526P - Phase Ib results of bemarituzumab (BEMA)+mfolfox6+nivolumab (NIVO) for advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (G/GEJC): Fortitude-102 part 1
Presenter: Zev Wainberg
Session: Poster session 21
1527P - Efficacy and safety of infigratinib in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma patients with FGFR2 gene amplification
Presenter: Jiajia Yuan
Session: Poster session 21
1528P - A phase I/II trial investigating safety and efficacy of autologous TAC01-HER2 in relapsed or refractory solid tumors
Presenter: Daniel Olson
Session: Poster session 21
1529P - Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy sequential neo-chemoradiotherapy therapy as total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ETNT)
Presenter: Wenwu He
Session: Poster session 21
1530P - Health-related quality of life (hrqol) in patients with claudin-18 isoform 2-positive (CLDN18.2+) locally advanced (LA) unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (mg/GEJ) adenocarcinoma: Results from SPOTLIGHT and GLOW
Presenter: Florian Lordick
Session: Poster session 21