Abstract 1561P
Background
Recently, we reported safety and efficacy of T-mab plus N-mab with S-1/Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (UMIN000034222). The aim of this study was to explore a candidate biomarker for this new combination therapy.
Methods
Patients were treated with S-1 80 mg/m2/day or Capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day on days 1-14 with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2, N-mab 360mg, and T-mab 8mg/kg for initial treatment, and subsequently with 6 mg/kg on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. Pre-treatment primary tumor samples were collected for whole exome sequencing (WES).
Results
42 patients enrolled in this clinical trial, and WES was performed on 23 patients. In the copy number analysis, ERBB2 amp. was observed most frequently in 15 patients (65%). Subsequently, GATA6, MYC and CCNE1 amp. were observed in 8 (35%), 6 (26%), and 5 (22%) patients, respectively. In the mutation analysis, TP53 was observed most frequently in 20 patients (87%). Subsequently, mutations in APC, ERBB3, and PIK3CA were observed in 6 (26%), 3 (13%), and 3 (13%) patients, respectively. Among them, APC mut., MYC, and GATA6 amp. were associated with worse survival. Patients with APC mut. showed significantly shorter PFS (median 5.6 vs 20.8 months, HR 3.47, 95%CI 1.16-10.44, p = 0.018), but not for OS (median 21.0 vs 26.5 months, HR 1.19, 95%CI 0.31-4.60, p = 0.806). Patients with MYC amp. showed significantly shorter PFS (median 4.2 vs 18.0 months, HR 3.48, 95%CI 1.09-11.12, p = 0.024) and OS (median 13.9 months vs not reached, HR 3.97, 95%CI 0.95-16.54, p = 0.042), respectively. Patients with GATA6 amp. showed significantly shorter PFS (median 5.8 vs 32.0 months, HR 3.53, 95%CI 1.25-9.99, p = 0.011) and OS (median 13.9 months vs not reached, HR 3.74, 95%CI 1.04-13.40, p = 0.030). As for objective response rates (ORRs), patients with APC mut. and MYC amp. showed lower response rates (50% vs 82% for APC mut., 67% vs 77% for MYC amp.), whereas comparable ORR was shown for GATA6 amp. (75% vs 73 %).
Conclusions
APC mut., MYC, and GATA6 amp. may have negative clinical impacts on the effects of the new combination therapy including T-mab and N-mab.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
K. Chin: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Taiho Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co.Ltd., Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Merck & Co., Inc. K. Minashi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, Taiho, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Astellas Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd,. H. Hara: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Ono, Bayer, Chugai, Lilly, Merck Biopharma, Taiho, Takeda, Yakult, Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo, Janssen, Merck Biopharma, MSD, Ono, Taiho, ALX oncology. K. Kato: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck and Co; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck and Co, Bayer, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Taiho, Merck Biophrma, Amgen, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Ono Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Bayer, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Chugai, Taiho, Oncolys Biopharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical. N. Boku: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Takeda Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical. K. Yamaguchi: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Taiho; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono, Eli Lilly Japan; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Taiho. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1489P - To investigate the differences in efficacy between immunotherapy and combined immunotherapy in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Ye Mao
Session: Poster session 21
1490P - Removal of TNF-Rs frees TNF-α’s anticancer activity alone or in combination chemo- or immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC
Presenter: Mustafa Bozkurt
Session: Poster session 21
1491P - PD-L1 TPS ≥50% predicts durable response after discontinuing immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients
Presenter: Jeongmin Seo
Session: Poster session 21
1493P - A phase II, multi-center, open-label, dose-optimization study evaluating telomere targeting agent THIO sequenced with cemiplimab in patients with advanced NSCLC: Preliminary results
Presenter: Tomasz Jankowski
Session: Poster session 21
1495P - Cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥1%: EMPOWER-Lung 3 results
Presenter: Ana Baramidze
Session: Poster session 21
1496P - Higher levels of CSF-1 support resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Paul Takam Kamga
Session: Poster session 21
1497P - Gut microbiome is associated with the clinical response to anti-PD-1 based immunotherapy in untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Presenter: Yawen Bin
Session: Poster session 21