Abstract 1561P
Background
Recently, we reported safety and efficacy of T-mab plus N-mab with S-1/Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (UMIN000034222). The aim of this study was to explore a candidate biomarker for this new combination therapy.
Methods
Patients were treated with S-1 80 mg/m2/day or Capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day on days 1-14 with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2, N-mab 360mg, and T-mab 8mg/kg for initial treatment, and subsequently with 6 mg/kg on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. Pre-treatment primary tumor samples were collected for whole exome sequencing (WES).
Results
42 patients enrolled in this clinical trial, and WES was performed on 23 patients. In the copy number analysis, ERBB2 amp. was observed most frequently in 15 patients (65%). Subsequently, GATA6, MYC and CCNE1 amp. were observed in 8 (35%), 6 (26%), and 5 (22%) patients, respectively. In the mutation analysis, TP53 was observed most frequently in 20 patients (87%). Subsequently, mutations in APC, ERBB3, and PIK3CA were observed in 6 (26%), 3 (13%), and 3 (13%) patients, respectively. Among them, APC mut., MYC, and GATA6 amp. were associated with worse survival. Patients with APC mut. showed significantly shorter PFS (median 5.6 vs 20.8 months, HR 3.47, 95%CI 1.16-10.44, p = 0.018), but not for OS (median 21.0 vs 26.5 months, HR 1.19, 95%CI 0.31-4.60, p = 0.806). Patients with MYC amp. showed significantly shorter PFS (median 4.2 vs 18.0 months, HR 3.48, 95%CI 1.09-11.12, p = 0.024) and OS (median 13.9 months vs not reached, HR 3.97, 95%CI 0.95-16.54, p = 0.042), respectively. Patients with GATA6 amp. showed significantly shorter PFS (median 5.8 vs 32.0 months, HR 3.53, 95%CI 1.25-9.99, p = 0.011) and OS (median 13.9 months vs not reached, HR 3.74, 95%CI 1.04-13.40, p = 0.030). As for objective response rates (ORRs), patients with APC mut. and MYC amp. showed lower response rates (50% vs 82% for APC mut., 67% vs 77% for MYC amp.), whereas comparable ORR was shown for GATA6 amp. (75% vs 73 %).
Conclusions
APC mut., MYC, and GATA6 amp. may have negative clinical impacts on the effects of the new combination therapy including T-mab and N-mab.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
K. Chin: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Taiho Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co.Ltd., Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Merck & Co., Inc. K. Minashi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, Taiho, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Astellas Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd,. H. Hara: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Ono, Bayer, Chugai, Lilly, Merck Biopharma, Taiho, Takeda, Yakult, Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo, Janssen, Merck Biopharma, MSD, Ono, Taiho, ALX oncology. K. Kato: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck and Co; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck and Co, Bayer, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Taiho, Merck Biophrma, Amgen, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Ono Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Bayer, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Chugai, Taiho, Oncolys Biopharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical. N. Boku: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Takeda Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical. K. Yamaguchi: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Taiho; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono, Eli Lilly Japan; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Taiho. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1542P - Updated results of a phase II clinical trial: Paclitaxel and carboplatin plus PD-1 blockades combined with anlotinib as first-line treatment for advanced oesophageal cancer
Presenter: Mingfang Xu
Session: Poster session 21
1543P - Clinical study of camrelizumab combined with docetaxel and carboplatin in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Rui Wang
Session: Poster session 21
1544P - Camrelizumab plus albumin-bound paclitaxel and S-1 as first-line treatment of advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: A phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Xin fang Hou
Session: Poster session 21
1545P - Phase II trial of endostar in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus
Presenter: Yuexiao Qi
Session: Poster session 21
1546P - Safety, efficacy, and biomarkers for ONO-4578 plus nivolumab in unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal cancer
Presenter: Hidekazu Hirano
Session: Poster session 21
1547P - SNP discovery based on transcriptome sequencing of whole blood RNA to find predictive biomarkers for nivolumab in gastric cancer
Presenter: Chiaki Inagaki
Session: Poster session 21
1549P - A prospective study of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genomic profiling in gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer patients with recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy: Liquid-GEAR trial
Presenter: Hiroyuki Takeda
Session: Poster session 21
1551P - Clinicopathologic characteristics and genomic profiling of HER2-low advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Choong-kun Lee
Session: Poster session 21
1552P - Clinical multi-omics analysis of gastric cancer (GC) in Europe (EU) and Latin America (LatAm): The LEGACy project
Presenter: Tania Fleitas
Session: Poster session 21