Abstract 4836
Background
Lung cancer patients with activating EGFR mutations tend to respond poorly to IO, but this is not true for all activating mutation driven lung cancers. Recent data show that patients with BRAF mutations tend to respond better to IO. Our study estimated the tumor neoantigen burden in these tumors, and the likelihood of their presentation to cytotoxic T cells by estimating their binding affinity to major histocompatibility complex (MHC).
Methods
Whole exome data for 68 patients with EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma and 33 with BRAF mutations were extracted from the Cancer Genome Atlas. MAFTOOLs was used to determine the tumor mutational load. Nonamers were estimated by simulating possible nonamer neoantigens from MAF files. The neoantigen (MT) and wildtype (WT) binding affinities to MHC-I were calculated using the NetMHC 4.0 server. The differential binding affinity of the neoantigens in comparison to wildtype was calculated as mean differential agretopicity index (DAI) = WT - MT. Patient survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
Patients with mutated BRAF had higher median mutational burden (445, range 165-776) than those with EGFR mutations (90.5, range 60.5-219.5, p = 0.001). The median number of simulated neoantigens was higher in the BRAF (9536.5, range 3839.5-14626.0) vs the EGFR group (1895.5, range 1148.5-4766.5, p < 0.001). Mean DAI for BRAF and EGFR patients were 1046 and 1033, respectively, p = 0.86. In the BRAF mutant group, patients with DAI < 1,000 had significantly better 5-year survival (80% vs 40%, p = 0.022) compared to patients with DAI > 1,000. No such survival benefit was identified in the EGFR mutant group (56% vs 58%, p = 0.81).
Conclusions
BRAF mutant lung cancers are characterized by higher neoantigen burden, but their neoantigen differential binding affinity to MHC-I complex was not different from EGFR mutant lung cancers. Our analysis suggests that the improved response to IO in the BRAF mutant population is due to increased quantity in neoantigen burden and not a qualitative difference in MHC-I binding. Further, DAI had a prognostic impact in the BRAF population suggesting that it may be a measure of tumor neoantigen immunogenicity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J. Subramanian: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Paradigm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Biocept. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2927 - Singapore Caregiver Quality Of Life Scale (SCQOLS): Turkish Validity and Reliability Study
Presenter: Nur Basak
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5066 - Screening for Psicosocial Distress in recently diagnosed cancer patients
Presenter: Eva Baillès
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6074 - Socio-demographic characteristics and quality of life analysis of cancer survivors followed at a Primary Care Center.
Presenter: Begona Grana Suarez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5129 - The adhesion in the screening measures in carrying patients of breast cancer and ovary hereditary and the relationship with the psychological aspects
Presenter: Melinda Concepcion
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5635 - Assessment of emotional discomfort of oncological patients in the first nursing visit at Donostia University Hospital
Presenter: Elena Uranga
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
858 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of the distress thermometer for the screening of distress in Chinese patients with cancer
Presenter: Hui Hui Sun
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4475 - Pharmacist and Nurse (PN) Led Melanoma Immunotherapy Clinic: Patient Experience Survey
Presenter: Dharmisha Chauhan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1871 - Phone Triage & Acute Review Clinics: The emerging role of the Oncology Specialist Nurse
Presenter: Fiona Barrett
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5193 - Patient reported outcomes during immunotherapy: symptom burden in daily clinical practice
Presenter: José Koldenhof
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2453 - Factors related to hospital length of stay, re-admissions and unplanned care for patients with cancer, an on-going study
Presenter: Helena Ullgren
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract