Abstract 4836
Background
Lung cancer patients with activating EGFR mutations tend to respond poorly to IO, but this is not true for all activating mutation driven lung cancers. Recent data show that patients with BRAF mutations tend to respond better to IO. Our study estimated the tumor neoantigen burden in these tumors, and the likelihood of their presentation to cytotoxic T cells by estimating their binding affinity to major histocompatibility complex (MHC).
Methods
Whole exome data for 68 patients with EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma and 33 with BRAF mutations were extracted from the Cancer Genome Atlas. MAFTOOLs was used to determine the tumor mutational load. Nonamers were estimated by simulating possible nonamer neoantigens from MAF files. The neoantigen (MT) and wildtype (WT) binding affinities to MHC-I were calculated using the NetMHC 4.0 server. The differential binding affinity of the neoantigens in comparison to wildtype was calculated as mean differential agretopicity index (DAI) = WT - MT. Patient survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
Patients with mutated BRAF had higher median mutational burden (445, range 165-776) than those with EGFR mutations (90.5, range 60.5-219.5, p = 0.001). The median number of simulated neoantigens was higher in the BRAF (9536.5, range 3839.5-14626.0) vs the EGFR group (1895.5, range 1148.5-4766.5, p < 0.001). Mean DAI for BRAF and EGFR patients were 1046 and 1033, respectively, p = 0.86. In the BRAF mutant group, patients with DAI < 1,000 had significantly better 5-year survival (80% vs 40%, p = 0.022) compared to patients with DAI > 1,000. No such survival benefit was identified in the EGFR mutant group (56% vs 58%, p = 0.81).
Conclusions
BRAF mutant lung cancers are characterized by higher neoantigen burden, but their neoantigen differential binding affinity to MHC-I complex was not different from EGFR mutant lung cancers. Our analysis suggests that the improved response to IO in the BRAF mutant population is due to increased quantity in neoantigen burden and not a qualitative difference in MHC-I binding. Further, DAI had a prognostic impact in the BRAF population suggesting that it may be a measure of tumor neoantigen immunogenicity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J. Subramanian: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Paradigm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Biocept. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3073 - 1 patient 3 different advance Ca nurse’s roles: symptom management&continuum care through a joint approach in a clinical case
Presenter: Catarina Almeida
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4527 - Identification of malnutrition risk factors in patients with cancer in the first nursing visit
Presenter: Amaia Valverde
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2904 - Engaging Cancer Survivors, Healthcare Providers and Advocates in The Development of a Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Information Resource: A Participatory Action Research Study
Presenter: Amanda Drury
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3435 - Medical nurses’ experiences of the care-needs of adult patients with a primary brain tumour
Presenter: Jamila Mohammed
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
857 - Feasibility and acceptability of a mHealth intervention to increase colonoscopy uptake among Chinese first-degree relatives: a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial
Presenter: Yang Bai
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1087 - Cancer patient participation and compliance in microbiome sample collection: an oncology research nurse’s experience
Presenter: Julie Malo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2783 - Implementing Digital Individual Care plans for Patients with Head and Neck cancer- Challenges and opportunities
Presenter: Helena Ullgren
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1152 - The Effect of the Short-term and Long-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program on the Quality of Life, Perceived Stress and Psychological Resilience of Oncology-Hematology Nurses
Presenter: Tugba Pehlivan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1172 - Competing risk analyses of overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with orbital rhabdomyosarcoma after surgery: a large cohort study
Presenter: Yu Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5949 - Communication of genetic information to family members in hereditary cancers and healthcare providers’ role
Presenter: Carla Pedrazzani
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract