Abstract 5193
Background
PD(L)1-inhibitors can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs.). IrAEs may be under-recognized and their influence on health-related quality of life (HRQL) underestimated. At this point, insight into patient-reported symptom prevalence and intensity is limited.
Methods
In this cohort study, patients with melanoma or lung carcinoma treated with PD(L)1-inhibitors - as per standard of care - between February 2016 and December 2018, were included. Patient characteristics, patient-reported symptoms and well-being, influence of (ir)AEs on HRQL were prospectively obtained, just as irAEs from professional perspectives and treatment decisions. Used instruments were the patient-scored Utrecht Symptom Diary (USD) and the professional-scored Common Terminology Criteria for AEs v4.03. Patients completed the USD as part of routine care.
Results
162 patients with melanoma (55%) or lung carcinoma (45%) were included. 59% were men, median age was 66 years. Most patients (89%) were treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Preliminary analysis shows that at baseline patients reported a median of 4 symptoms with an USD-score ≥3 (11-point numeric rating scale). Symptom burden caused by anorexia (p=.035), cough (p=.000), dyspnea (p=.002) and fatigue (p=.012) differed significantly between tumor types. CTCAE grade 3 toxicity occurred in 20 patients (12%) and significantly more often in patients with melanoma (p=.004) and in patients previously treated with immunotherapy (p=.000). At time of grade 3 toxicity occurrence, patients experienced a median of six clinically relevant symptoms (USD ≥3), which was not significantly different from baseline. The median USD-score of influence of AEs on HRQL was 3 (NRS 0-7).
Conclusions
This study shows that the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as standard of care provides insight into symptom burden from patient perspectives in patients with melanoma or lung carcinoma during immunotherapy. As a result, PROs can add additional information to the objectified severity of symptoms as scored by professionals, just as to effect evaluation of interventions performed. Final results will be presented at the conference.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J.J. Koldenhof: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. K.P.M. Suijkerbuijk: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5520 - Patient’s Usability Test results of a CINV Diary Application For Smartphones
Presenter: Paz Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2323 - Colorectal Telephone Assessment Pathway (CTAP) - A viable means of shortening time to a definitive diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Presenter: Harriet Watson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6119 - Cancer Nursing and Social Media: Capturing the Zeitgeist
Presenter: Mark Foulkes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1776 - Examination of mobile applications on breast cancer
Presenter: AYDANUR AYDIN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4128 - E-health effectiveness to increase patient adherence for immunotherapy; a cost-benefit study.
Presenter: Maria José Dias
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3219 - Experiences of internet-based stepped care among individuals with recently diagnosed cancer and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression
Presenter: Anna Hauffman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5010 - What do cancer patients know about their immunotherapy treatment?
Presenter: Mónica Arellano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4503 - Prospective Comparison of Travel Burden, Cost and Time to Obtain Tumor Board Treatment Plan Through In-Person Visits vs. an AI Enabled Health Technology (N=1803)
Presenter: Rajendra Badwe
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4123 - Cancer care through the fire and flames: 3-year experience in the utilisation of electronic consultation and referral system at the Red Zone in Southern Thailand
Presenter: Nanthiya Rattanakhot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2087 - The effect of e-mobile education on the quality of life in women with breast cancer
Presenter: Derya ÇInar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract