Abstract 1082
Background
Older cancer patients are a vulnerable group of medication users. Pharmacist-led medication reviews may optimize treatment and thereby reduce the risk of harmful effects from medication use. This study aims to determine the prevalence and management of Potentially Inappropriate Medication use (PIM’s) and Potential Omissions in Medication (POM’s) in older cancer patients.
Methods
In this prospective observational study (hospital) pharmacists conducted medication reviews with older cancer patients (aged ≥65 years) treated with parenteral chemo and/or immunotherapy to determine the prevalence of PIM’s and POM’s. PIM’s and POM’s were identified using the Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP), the screening Tool to Alert doctors to the Right Treatment (START) and pharmacists’ expert opinion. Recommendations regarding PIM’s and POM’s were made to the patient’s oncologist/haematologist and follow-up was measured. Associations between covariates and the prevalence of PIM’s and POM’s were statistically analysed.
Results
117 (78%) of the 150 patients included (median age 72 years, 59% male, 68% solid tumours, mean number of medicines 11) had at least one PIM and/or PIM. In total 266 PIM’s and POM’s were identified, and these led to 195 (73%) follow-up actions (table). The number of medicines and Charlson Comorbidity Index score (as a measure of vulnerability) were both independently associated with having at least one PIM and/or POM (p = .031 and p = .002 respectively).Table:
1825P Identification and follow-up of PIM’s and POM’s
PIM’s and POM’s | |
---|---|
n (%) | |
PIM’s, total Using STOPP | 180 89 (49) |
Using expert opinion | 85 (47) |
Using both | 6 (3) |
POM’s, total Using START | 86 66 (77) |
Using expert opinion | 20 (23) |
Follow-up actions By oncologist/haematologist | 266 77 (29) |
By general practitioner | 118 (44) |
No follow-up action | 71 (27) |
Conclusions
PIM’s and POM’s are highly prevalent among older cancer patients. A pharmacist-led medication review using STOPP/START criteria and pharmacists’ expert opinion is an excellent way to identify these PIM’s and POM’s and to optimize patients’ medication use. The majority of recommendations made regarding PIM’s and POM’s leads to a follow-up action.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Deventer Teaching Hospital.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
F.G.A. Jansman: Advisory / Consultancy, 2016: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, 2016: Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4852 - Impact of routine screening and preemptive treatment on hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) in patients receiving chemotherapy
Presenter: Celine Marty
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5225 - The uptake, patient satisfaction and efficacy of scalp cooling among patients receiving chemotherapy in an Irish oncology day ward.
Presenter: William Maher
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1901 - Placebo adverse events (AEs) in targeted and immune cancer therapy in the adjuvant and advanced setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Diego Enrico
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3258 - Reduced antibody levels and high seronegativity rates against vaccine preventable diseases pose a risk factor for infections in patients with solid and hematologic cancers
Presenter: Angela Guzek
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3211 - Prognostic Factors Influencing Outcome After Therapy With Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Presenter: Veselina Goranova - Marinova
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4949 - Phase I Study of CC-90010 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R NHL)
Presenter: Victor Moreno
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2271 - Pretreatment coagulation factors related to prognosis in patients with natural killer/T cell lymphoma
Presenter: Yue Chai
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4335 - Diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the elderly. A retrospective analysis of standard versus alternative treatments
Presenter: Irene Sillero
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5117 - MIPI as a superior prognostic tool in Mantle Cell Lymphoma compared to monocyte-lymphocyte, neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios
Presenter: Filipa Macedo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5135 - Dose adjustment of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma using automated and standardized analysis and evaluation of DNA double strand breaks
Presenter: Julia Schröder
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract