Abstract 1082
Background
Older cancer patients are a vulnerable group of medication users. Pharmacist-led medication reviews may optimize treatment and thereby reduce the risk of harmful effects from medication use. This study aims to determine the prevalence and management of Potentially Inappropriate Medication use (PIM’s) and Potential Omissions in Medication (POM’s) in older cancer patients.
Methods
In this prospective observational study (hospital) pharmacists conducted medication reviews with older cancer patients (aged ≥65 years) treated with parenteral chemo and/or immunotherapy to determine the prevalence of PIM’s and POM’s. PIM’s and POM’s were identified using the Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP), the screening Tool to Alert doctors to the Right Treatment (START) and pharmacists’ expert opinion. Recommendations regarding PIM’s and POM’s were made to the patient’s oncologist/haematologist and follow-up was measured. Associations between covariates and the prevalence of PIM’s and POM’s were statistically analysed.
Results
117 (78%) of the 150 patients included (median age 72 years, 59% male, 68% solid tumours, mean number of medicines 11) had at least one PIM and/or PIM. In total 266 PIM’s and POM’s were identified, and these led to 195 (73%) follow-up actions (table). The number of medicines and Charlson Comorbidity Index score (as a measure of vulnerability) were both independently associated with having at least one PIM and/or POM (p = .031 and p = .002 respectively).Table:
1825P Identification and follow-up of PIM’s and POM’s
PIM’s and POM’s | |
---|---|
n (%) | |
PIM’s, total Using STOPP | 180 89 (49) |
Using expert opinion | 85 (47) |
Using both | 6 (3) |
POM’s, total Using START | 86 66 (77) |
Using expert opinion | 20 (23) |
Follow-up actions By oncologist/haematologist | 266 77 (29) |
By general practitioner | 118 (44) |
No follow-up action | 71 (27) |
Conclusions
PIM’s and POM’s are highly prevalent among older cancer patients. A pharmacist-led medication review using STOPP/START criteria and pharmacists’ expert opinion is an excellent way to identify these PIM’s and POM’s and to optimize patients’ medication use. The majority of recommendations made regarding PIM’s and POM’s leads to a follow-up action.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Deventer Teaching Hospital.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
F.G.A. Jansman: Advisory / Consultancy, 2016: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, 2016: Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1269 - One-year follow-up results of eribulin for soft-tissue sarcoma including rare subtypes in a real-world observational study in Japan
Presenter: Shunji Takahashi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2868 - Prevalence of chemotherapy use and its impact on overall survival in patients with bone- and soft tissue sarcomas -A population-based analysis of 3746 patients
Presenter: Herbert Loong
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3042 - Clinical course and therapeutic management of classical and endemic Kaposi’s Sarcoma (C/E KS)
Presenter: Lina Benajiba
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3141 - The final outcomes of study on combined therapy of adult patients with localized synovial sarcoma
Presenter: Katarzyna Kozak
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5449 - Real-world Outcomes of Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Epithelioid Sarcoma
Presenter: Mrinal Gounder
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4465 - SAKK 57/16 Nab-Paclitaxel And Gemcitabine in soft tissue sarcoma (NAPAGE): results from the phase I part of a phase I/II trial
Presenter: Antonia Digklia
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5013 - Outcome of 98 patients with epithelioid sarcoma treated in curative intent: a retrospective study from the French Sarcoma Group (GSF-GETO)
Presenter: Maud Pedrono
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5614 - Comparison of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in sarcoma patients receiving highly myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Presenter: Paolo Tarantino
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1033 - Access to clinical trials for soft tissue sarcoma patients in Western and Eastern Europe
Presenter: Vasilii Ostafiichuk
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4094 - Treatment outcomes for adult patients with localized osteosarcoma treated with chemotherapy without methotrexate
Presenter: Marília Silva
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract