Abstract 1871
Background
Much of the work of a busy oncology day unit is undocumented, especially the work involved in phone triage during the working hours of 8am to 6pm. Phone calls from patients, their family doctors, palliative care teams, or from within the Hospital itself seeking advice form the majority of this aspect of the Specialist Oncology Nurse and Staff Nurses’ time. This project was performed to assess the nature of these calls and the broad advice given to the callers so that a dedicated Acute Review Specialist Oncology Nurse Clinic could be developed.
Methods
In conjunction with key oncology nurses and their medical oncologist colleagues a log to capture each answered call was developed. This centred on the date and time of the call, the source, the issue raised, the advice given, if advised to go to the Emergency Room the reason why, and other actions that were necessary. A form was completed per answered call, and collected at the end of the day. Data was recorded on a spreadsheet. All forms were annonymised with regard to patient identifiers. The forms were focused on whether the issue was successfully addressed within the day unit, the Hospital’s emergency room, the community services, or whether solely by the advice given over the telephone.
Results
A sample size of 252 incoming answered calls by the Oncology Nursing Staff to the Nurses’ station was analysed. Just over half these calls (52%) were made by patients/family members. Other calls related to internal questions such as from Interventional Radiology or other diagnostic areas of the Hospital (26%), pharmacies (7%), and family doctors (4%). The other 11% of calls were mainly from wards relating to advice on inpatients or seeking consults. Of the unwell patients calling for advice, near half (48%) were seeking advice on what action to take: stay at home or come to Hospital. 35% of patients were seeking either a new appointment or change in appointment date. The remaining 17% of patients were seeking non-emergency review by the medical oncology team.
Conclusions
This analysis of answered calls highlights the need for involvement of experienced oncology nurses in the triage of phone calls to a busy oncology day unit, and the need to develop an Acute Review Clinic, managed by an experienced oncology nurse specialist.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Beaumont Hospital Cancer Centre.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5389 - Two-weekly accelerated BEP (aBEP) regimen as induction chemotherapy (CT) in intermediate and poor prognosis patients (pts) with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT): final results of phase II trial.
Presenter: Alexey Tryakin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2934 - Differential expression of circulating miR375 and miR371 to detect teratoma and viable germ cell malignancy
Presenter: Lucia Nappi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3585 - Prognosis of anaemia in disseminated testicular germ cell tumours. On behalf of the Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group (SGCCG)
Presenter: Esmeralda Garcia Torralba
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2254 - The Effects Of Primary Testicular Tumor Localization On Prognosis In Patients With Nonseminomatous Testis Cancer
Presenter: Birol Yildiz
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4505 - Initial Results of a Phase II study of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Metastatic Adrenal Tumors.
Presenter: Matthew Campbell
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3369 - NEMIO: a randomized phase II trial evaluating efficacy and safety of dose dense MVAC (ddMVAC) + durvalumab +/- tremelimumab as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with bladder muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Constance Thibault
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2075 - KEYNOTE-866: Phase 3 Study of Perioperative Pembrolizumab (pembro) or Placebo (pbo) in Combination With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Cisplatin (cis)-Eligible Patients (pts) With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4824 - KEYNOTE-905: A Phase 3 Study of Cystectomy Plus Perioperative Pembrolizumab Versus Cystectomy Alone in Cisplatin (cis)-Ineligible Patients (pts) With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC)
Presenter: Matthew Galsky
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2253 - Phase 3 LEAP-011 trial: First-Line Pembrolizumab With Lenvatinib in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Ineligible to Receive Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4310 - PULSE : A Single Arm Trial Assessing The Activity and Safety of Avelumab Immunotherapy Maintenance among Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Squamous Cell Penile Carcinoma (mSCPC).
Presenter: Noemie Gassian
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract