Abstract 1871
Background
Much of the work of a busy oncology day unit is undocumented, especially the work involved in phone triage during the working hours of 8am to 6pm. Phone calls from patients, their family doctors, palliative care teams, or from within the Hospital itself seeking advice form the majority of this aspect of the Specialist Oncology Nurse and Staff Nurses’ time. This project was performed to assess the nature of these calls and the broad advice given to the callers so that a dedicated Acute Review Specialist Oncology Nurse Clinic could be developed.
Methods
In conjunction with key oncology nurses and their medical oncologist colleagues a log to capture each answered call was developed. This centred on the date and time of the call, the source, the issue raised, the advice given, if advised to go to the Emergency Room the reason why, and other actions that were necessary. A form was completed per answered call, and collected at the end of the day. Data was recorded on a spreadsheet. All forms were annonymised with regard to patient identifiers. The forms were focused on whether the issue was successfully addressed within the day unit, the Hospital’s emergency room, the community services, or whether solely by the advice given over the telephone.
Results
A sample size of 252 incoming answered calls by the Oncology Nursing Staff to the Nurses’ station was analysed. Just over half these calls (52%) were made by patients/family members. Other calls related to internal questions such as from Interventional Radiology or other diagnostic areas of the Hospital (26%), pharmacies (7%), and family doctors (4%). The other 11% of calls were mainly from wards relating to advice on inpatients or seeking consults. Of the unwell patients calling for advice, near half (48%) were seeking advice on what action to take: stay at home or come to Hospital. 35% of patients were seeking either a new appointment or change in appointment date. The remaining 17% of patients were seeking non-emergency review by the medical oncology team.
Conclusions
This analysis of answered calls highlights the need for involvement of experienced oncology nurses in the triage of phone calls to a busy oncology day unit, and the need to develop an Acute Review Clinic, managed by an experienced oncology nurse specialist.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Beaumont Hospital Cancer Centre.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3630 - Results of phase 1 clinical trial of high doses of Seleno-L-methionine (SLM) in sequential combination with Axitinib in previously treated and relapsed clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) patients
Presenter: Yousef Zakharia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2356 - Safety and Efficacy of CDX-014 , an Antibody-Drug Conjugate against T Cell immunoglobulin mucin-1 (TIM-1), in advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1028 - SPAZO2 (SOGUG): Outcomes and prognostic significance of IMDC intermediate prognosis subclassification in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in patients treated with 1st-line pazopanib (1stPz).
Presenter: Begona P. Valderrama
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2293 - Effect of Antacid Intake on the Therapeutic Efficacy of Sunitinib (SUN) in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients (pts): a Sub-Analysis of the STAR-TOR Registry
Presenter: Katrin Schlack
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1451 - Randomized phase 3 trial of avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: JAVELIN Renal 101 Japanese subgroup analysis
Presenter: Motohide Uemura
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4399 - Overall and progression-free survival according to MSKCC scores in 1st line sunitinib treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Presenter: Jindrich Finek
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1344 - Combination therapy with checkpoint inhibitors for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Presenter: Kyaw Thein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3462 - A phase II trial of TKI induction followed by a randomized comparison between nivolumab or TKI continuation in renal cell carcinoma (NIVOSWITCH)
Presenter: Viktor Grünwald
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5268 - Nivolumab (N) treatment beyond progression in a real-world cohort of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Presenter: Sophie Hans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4235 - First results of safety profile of nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in II and III line of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in NIVES Study
Presenter: Cristina Masini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract