Abstract 1871
Background
Much of the work of a busy oncology day unit is undocumented, especially the work involved in phone triage during the working hours of 8am to 6pm. Phone calls from patients, their family doctors, palliative care teams, or from within the Hospital itself seeking advice form the majority of this aspect of the Specialist Oncology Nurse and Staff Nurses’ time. This project was performed to assess the nature of these calls and the broad advice given to the callers so that a dedicated Acute Review Specialist Oncology Nurse Clinic could be developed.
Methods
In conjunction with key oncology nurses and their medical oncologist colleagues a log to capture each answered call was developed. This centred on the date and time of the call, the source, the issue raised, the advice given, if advised to go to the Emergency Room the reason why, and other actions that were necessary. A form was completed per answered call, and collected at the end of the day. Data was recorded on a spreadsheet. All forms were annonymised with regard to patient identifiers. The forms were focused on whether the issue was successfully addressed within the day unit, the Hospital’s emergency room, the community services, or whether solely by the advice given over the telephone.
Results
A sample size of 252 incoming answered calls by the Oncology Nursing Staff to the Nurses’ station was analysed. Just over half these calls (52%) were made by patients/family members. Other calls related to internal questions such as from Interventional Radiology or other diagnostic areas of the Hospital (26%), pharmacies (7%), and family doctors (4%). The other 11% of calls were mainly from wards relating to advice on inpatients or seeking consults. Of the unwell patients calling for advice, near half (48%) were seeking advice on what action to take: stay at home or come to Hospital. 35% of patients were seeking either a new appointment or change in appointment date. The remaining 17% of patients were seeking non-emergency review by the medical oncology team.
Conclusions
This analysis of answered calls highlights the need for involvement of experienced oncology nurses in the triage of phone calls to a busy oncology day unit, and the need to develop an Acute Review Clinic, managed by an experienced oncology nurse specialist.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Beaumont Hospital Cancer Centre.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2262 - Real world experience of Nivolumab therapy in Metastatic Renal Cancer patients: a 3 year multi-centre review
Presenter: Joanna Hack
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4441 - “A pilot study of tremelimumab (treme) with or without cryoablation (cryo) in patients (pts) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).”
Presenter: Matthew Campbell
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2613 - Lenvatinib (Len) alone or in combination with Everolimus (Eve) in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and VEGFR-targeted therapies: A single-institution experience
Presenter: Andrew Wiele
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3249 - Weight loss is an underestimated adverse event with cabozantinib in patients with metastastic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).
Presenter: Emeline Colomba
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2405 - Impact of corticosteroids on nivolumab activity in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Presenter: Felix Lefort
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4020 - Skeletal muscle loss as an adverse event during Cabozantinib treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Carolina Alves Costa Silva
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2407 - Long term relative survival (RS) in patients with primary metastatic kidney cancer (primary mRCC): an analysis of 2,167 patients from the Austrian National Cancer Registry (ANCR).
Presenter: Monika Hackl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2470 - Advanced renal cell carcinoma: first results from the prospective research platform CARAT for patients with mRCC in Germany
Presenter: Peter Goebell
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1533 - Are immune checkpoint inhibitors a valid option for papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma? Transcriptomic characterization of the immune infiltrate
Presenter: Manon De Vries-brilland
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3367 - Treatment-Free Survival, With and Without Toxicity, as a Novel Outcome Applied to Immuno-Oncology Agents in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Presenter: Meredith Regan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract