Abstract 1398
Background
Eribulin is approved for treatment of advanced/metastatic breast cancer and previously treated, unresected liposarcoma. E7389-LF is a liposomal formulation of eribulin. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in a prior phase 1 study was 1.4 mg/m2 Q3W or 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W.
Methods
The primary objective was to determine MTD and compare the tolerability of higher (> prior) Q3W doses vs the prior Q2W dose. E7389-LF was administered (3 + 3 design) intravenously Q3W (day 1 of a 21-day cycle) and Q2W (days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) to solid tumor pts in Japan for which no alternative standard or effective therapy exists. Planned dose ranges were 1.0-2.5 mg/m2 Q3W and 1.0-1.5 mg/m2 Q2W.
Results
21 pts were enrolled; 3, 3 and 6 pts in 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W; 3 and 6 pts in 1.0 and 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W, respectively. 10 pts were male, median age was 58 years (range, 22-68), and 11 had ECOG-PS 0. One dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W group (febrile neutropenia; n = 6); thus, 2.5 mg/m2 Q3W was not assessed. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 included neutropenia (67%), leukopenia (48%), anemia (19%), increased ɣ-glutamyltransferase, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia (each 14%). The MTDs were 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W and 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W. Partial response was noted in 4 pts (19%) with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, urothelial cancer, and small cell carcinoma of the cervix. Area-under-the-curve (AUC) values of total eribulin were higher and AUC of unbound eribulin in plasma lower with E7389-LF vs the standard dose of eribulin (Table).Table:
348P
Eribulin formulation/dose | Plasma AUC (h*ng/mL) of eribulin | |
---|---|---|
Total | Unbound | |
E7389-LF 1.0 mg/m2 | 26300 | 98.1 |
E7389-LF 1.5 mg/m2 | 34700 | 120 |
E7389-LF 2.0 mg/m2 | 39100 | 148 |
Standard eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 | 673 | 336 |
Conclusions
E7389-LF was well tolerated in Japanese pts with advanced solid tumors with antitumor effects in several tumor types. Plasma AUC of eribulin after administration of E7389-LF suggested a promising exposure profile of the liposomal formulation in humans. The 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W regimen was recommended for further investigation in an expansion cohort of specific tumor types.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03207672.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eisai Co., Ltd.
Funding
Eisai Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
N. Yamamoto: Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai, Taiho, Eisai, Lilly, Quintiles, Astellas, BMS, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kyowa-Hakko Kirin, ONO Pharmaceutical Co. LTD, Takeda, Janssen Pharma, MSD, Merck; Honoraria (self): ONO Pharmaceutical Co. LTD, Chugai, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly, BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai, Otsuka, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cimic. S. Iwasa: Research grant / Funding (institution), grants from Eisai, during the conduct of the study: Eisai, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Novartis, Merck-Serono, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eli Lilly, Taiho, Chugai, ONO Pharmaceutical Co., LTD. A. Shimomura: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Chugai; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Nippon Kayaku; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Eisai. S. Kondo: Research grant / Funding (institution): ASLAN Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer. K. Yonemori: Research grant / Funding (self), trail management at site: Eisai; Honoraria (self): Eisai. Y. Fujiwara: Research grant / Funding (institution): Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Merck Serono, Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Taiho, Sysmex, ONO, Novartis, MSD, Chugai, BMS, AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD, ONO, AstraZeneca, BMS. T. Shimizu: Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Millenium-Takeda, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Eisai, PharmaMar, 3D-Medicine, Symbio Pharmaceuticals, Chordia Therapeutics, Five Prime; Advisory / Consultancy: The Consortium on Harmonization of Institutional Requirements for Clinical Research (CHAIR) Joint Scientific Committee Review Member for Phase 1 trials in Hong Kong. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3082 - Prognostic and predictive role of body mass index (BMI) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a pooled analisys of TRIBE and TRIBE-2 studies by GONO
Presenter: Emanuela Dell'Aquila
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3618 - Drug holidays and overall survival in patients treated for metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Silvio Ken Garattini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
6111 - Quality of life during 1st-line FOLFOXIRI+/- panitumumab in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the randomized VOLFI trial (AIO KRK-0109)
Presenter: Michael Geissler
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1042 - A biomarker combination indicating resistance to FOLFOX plus bevacizumab in metastastic colorectal cancer : results of phase I of the PERMAD trial
Presenter: Thomas Seufferlein
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3291 - Microsatellite Instability (MSI) status and prognosis in colorectal cancer: meta-analysis
Presenter: James Toh
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2046 - Choosing the right strategy based on individualized treatment effect predictions: Combination versus sequential chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Presenter: Miriam Koopman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2589 - Noninferiority on overall survival of every-2-weeks vs weekly schedule of cetuximab for first-line treatment of RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Stefan Kasper
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4944 - POLAF study: Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/aflibercept in a phase II trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of plasmatic prognostic and predictive markers
Presenter: Maria Elena Elez Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2042 - The accuracy of the clinical PCI score in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Nadine De Boer
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2667 - The impact of late-line treatment on overall survival (OS) from the initiation of first-line chemotherapy (CT) for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Presenter: Takeshi Kawakami
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract