Abstract 1398
Background
Eribulin is approved for treatment of advanced/metastatic breast cancer and previously treated, unresected liposarcoma. E7389-LF is a liposomal formulation of eribulin. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in a prior phase 1 study was 1.4 mg/m2 Q3W or 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W.
Methods
The primary objective was to determine MTD and compare the tolerability of higher (> prior) Q3W doses vs the prior Q2W dose. E7389-LF was administered (3 + 3 design) intravenously Q3W (day 1 of a 21-day cycle) and Q2W (days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) to solid tumor pts in Japan for which no alternative standard or effective therapy exists. Planned dose ranges were 1.0-2.5 mg/m2 Q3W and 1.0-1.5 mg/m2 Q2W.
Results
21 pts were enrolled; 3, 3 and 6 pts in 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W; 3 and 6 pts in 1.0 and 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W, respectively. 10 pts were male, median age was 58 years (range, 22-68), and 11 had ECOG-PS 0. One dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W group (febrile neutropenia; n = 6); thus, 2.5 mg/m2 Q3W was not assessed. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 included neutropenia (67%), leukopenia (48%), anemia (19%), increased ɣ-glutamyltransferase, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia (each 14%). The MTDs were 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W and 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W. Partial response was noted in 4 pts (19%) with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, urothelial cancer, and small cell carcinoma of the cervix. Area-under-the-curve (AUC) values of total eribulin were higher and AUC of unbound eribulin in plasma lower with E7389-LF vs the standard dose of eribulin (Table).Table:
348P
Eribulin formulation/dose | Plasma AUC (h*ng/mL) of eribulin | |
---|---|---|
Total | Unbound | |
E7389-LF 1.0 mg/m2 | 26300 | 98.1 |
E7389-LF 1.5 mg/m2 | 34700 | 120 |
E7389-LF 2.0 mg/m2 | 39100 | 148 |
Standard eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 | 673 | 336 |
Conclusions
E7389-LF was well tolerated in Japanese pts with advanced solid tumors with antitumor effects in several tumor types. Plasma AUC of eribulin after administration of E7389-LF suggested a promising exposure profile of the liposomal formulation in humans. The 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W regimen was recommended for further investigation in an expansion cohort of specific tumor types.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03207672.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eisai Co., Ltd.
Funding
Eisai Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
N. Yamamoto: Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai, Taiho, Eisai, Lilly, Quintiles, Astellas, BMS, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kyowa-Hakko Kirin, ONO Pharmaceutical Co. LTD, Takeda, Janssen Pharma, MSD, Merck; Honoraria (self): ONO Pharmaceutical Co. LTD, Chugai, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly, BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai, Otsuka, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cimic. S. Iwasa: Research grant / Funding (institution), grants from Eisai, during the conduct of the study: Eisai, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Novartis, Merck-Serono, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eli Lilly, Taiho, Chugai, ONO Pharmaceutical Co., LTD. A. Shimomura: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Chugai; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Nippon Kayaku; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Eisai. S. Kondo: Research grant / Funding (institution): ASLAN Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer. K. Yonemori: Research grant / Funding (self), trail management at site: Eisai; Honoraria (self): Eisai. Y. Fujiwara: Research grant / Funding (institution): Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Merck Serono, Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Taiho, Sysmex, ONO, Novartis, MSD, Chugai, BMS, AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD, ONO, AstraZeneca, BMS. T. Shimizu: Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Millenium-Takeda, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Eisai, PharmaMar, 3D-Medicine, Symbio Pharmaceuticals, Chordia Therapeutics, Five Prime; Advisory / Consultancy: The Consortium on Harmonization of Institutional Requirements for Clinical Research (CHAIR) Joint Scientific Committee Review Member for Phase 1 trials in Hong Kong. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3963 - Robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for radical resection of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Zhengchuan Niu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3989 - Bevacizumab as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer: Updated results from the AVANT phase III Study by the GERCOR Group
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4741 - Real world data on adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colorectal cancer – the role of tumor side
Presenter: Camila Araujo de Carvalho
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4973 - Oncological Outcome and Safety of Bevacizumab (BV) Therapy in Patients with Occlusive Colon Cancer and Self-Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS)
Presenter: Vilma Pacheco-Barcia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2295 - Active chronic hepatitis B increases the risk of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer- a retrospective clinical study of 7187 consecutive cases of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer
Presenter: Lei Zhao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3845 - Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) Score for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Development and Validation
Presenter: Wei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1976 - BRAF-mutated colorectal metastases: what is the benefit of liver surgery? Results from a cohort of 91 patients.
Presenter: Sahir Javed
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2688 - The smallest colorectal liver metastasis size as a prognosis factor after laparoscopic liver resection
Presenter: Baptiste Cervantes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4961 - Validation of GAME score risk groups in resected colorectal cancer liver metastases and the prognostic relevance of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutation analysis
Presenter: Berta Martin-Cullell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5295 - Predictive factors and survival outcomes with stereotactic body radiation therapy in treatment of oligometastases in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract