Abstract 1398
Background
Eribulin is approved for treatment of advanced/metastatic breast cancer and previously treated, unresected liposarcoma. E7389-LF is a liposomal formulation of eribulin. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in a prior phase 1 study was 1.4 mg/m2 Q3W or 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W.
Methods
The primary objective was to determine MTD and compare the tolerability of higher (> prior) Q3W doses vs the prior Q2W dose. E7389-LF was administered (3 + 3 design) intravenously Q3W (day 1 of a 21-day cycle) and Q2W (days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) to solid tumor pts in Japan for which no alternative standard or effective therapy exists. Planned dose ranges were 1.0-2.5 mg/m2 Q3W and 1.0-1.5 mg/m2 Q2W.
Results
21 pts were enrolled; 3, 3 and 6 pts in 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W; 3 and 6 pts in 1.0 and 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W, respectively. 10 pts were male, median age was 58 years (range, 22-68), and 11 had ECOG-PS 0. One dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W group (febrile neutropenia; n = 6); thus, 2.5 mg/m2 Q3W was not assessed. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 included neutropenia (67%), leukopenia (48%), anemia (19%), increased ɣ-glutamyltransferase, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia (each 14%). The MTDs were 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W and 1.5 mg/m2 Q2W. Partial response was noted in 4 pts (19%) with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, urothelial cancer, and small cell carcinoma of the cervix. Area-under-the-curve (AUC) values of total eribulin were higher and AUC of unbound eribulin in plasma lower with E7389-LF vs the standard dose of eribulin (Table).Table:
348P
Eribulin formulation/dose | Plasma AUC (h*ng/mL) of eribulin | |
---|---|---|
Total | Unbound | |
E7389-LF 1.0 mg/m2 | 26300 | 98.1 |
E7389-LF 1.5 mg/m2 | 34700 | 120 |
E7389-LF 2.0 mg/m2 | 39100 | 148 |
Standard eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 | 673 | 336 |
Conclusions
E7389-LF was well tolerated in Japanese pts with advanced solid tumors with antitumor effects in several tumor types. Plasma AUC of eribulin after administration of E7389-LF suggested a promising exposure profile of the liposomal formulation in humans. The 2.0 mg/m2 Q3W regimen was recommended for further investigation in an expansion cohort of specific tumor types.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03207672.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eisai Co., Ltd.
Funding
Eisai Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
N. Yamamoto: Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai, Taiho, Eisai, Lilly, Quintiles, Astellas, BMS, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kyowa-Hakko Kirin, ONO Pharmaceutical Co. LTD, Takeda, Janssen Pharma, MSD, Merck; Honoraria (self): ONO Pharmaceutical Co. LTD, Chugai, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly, BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai, Otsuka, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cimic. S. Iwasa: Research grant / Funding (institution), grants from Eisai, during the conduct of the study: Eisai, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Novartis, Merck-Serono, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eli Lilly, Taiho, Chugai, ONO Pharmaceutical Co., LTD. A. Shimomura: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Chugai; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Nippon Kayaku; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, personal fees: Eisai. S. Kondo: Research grant / Funding (institution): ASLAN Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer. K. Yonemori: Research grant / Funding (self), trail management at site: Eisai; Honoraria (self): Eisai. Y. Fujiwara: Research grant / Funding (institution): Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Merck Serono, Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Taiho, Sysmex, ONO, Novartis, MSD, Chugai, BMS, AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD, ONO, AstraZeneca, BMS. T. Shimizu: Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Millenium-Takeda, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Eisai, PharmaMar, 3D-Medicine, Symbio Pharmaceuticals, Chordia Therapeutics, Five Prime; Advisory / Consultancy: The Consortium on Harmonization of Institutional Requirements for Clinical Research (CHAIR) Joint Scientific Committee Review Member for Phase 1 trials in Hong Kong. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5887 - Factors of importance in procuring tumoroids from colorectal liver metastasis biopsies for precision medicine.
Presenter: Lars Henrik Jensen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2196 - FUSAFE individual patient data meta-analysis (MA) to assess the performance of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) gene polymorphisms for predicting grade 4-5 fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity
Presenter: Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2859 - Treatments (tx) after progression to first-line FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab (bev) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts): A pooled analysis of TRIBE and TRIBE-2 studies by GONO.
Presenter: Daniele Rossini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3888 - Randomized phase III study of sequential treatment with capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (FP) plus bevacizumab (BEV) followed by the addition with oxaliplatin (OX) versus initial combination with OX+FP+ BEV in the first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: The C-cubed study
Presenter: Takeshi Nagasaka
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1065 - Early tumour shrinkage (ETS), depth of response (DpR) and associated survival outcomes in patients (pts) with RAS wild type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) classified according to Köhne prognostic category: retrospective analysis of the panitumumab (Pmab) PRIME study
Presenter: Andrea Sartore-Bianchi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1702 - Randomized phase II trial of CAPOX with planned oxaliplatin stop-and-go strategy as adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection of colon cancer (CCOG-1302 study)
Presenter: Hiroyuki Yokoyama
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5104 - A metabolomic recurrence score for risk-stratification of elderly patients (pts) with early colorectal cancer (eCRC)
Presenter: Samantha Di Donato
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5285 - RAS mutant allele fraction in plasma predicts benefit to anti-angiogenic based first line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Giulia Martini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1790 - Impact of prophylactic systemic antibiotics (SA) on outcome of patients (pts) with RAS-wildtype (RAS-wt) metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) treated with cetuximab-based first-line therapy. Subgroup analysis of the german non-interventional study ERBITAG
Presenter: Stephan Sahm
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3059 - Intraoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU for colorectal cancer patients receiving curative resection (IOCCRC): A randomized, multicenter, prospective, phase III trial
Presenter: Rongxin Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract