Abstract 1947
Background
NEPA is the first and only fixed oral combination of a long-acting NK1receptor antagonist (RA), netupitant, and a pharmacologically distinct 5-HT3RA, palonosetron. NEPA is approved for prevention of chemotherapy (ctx)-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients (pts) receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic ctx (HEC) or moderately emetogenic ctx (MEC). Here we present patient-reported outcomes (PRO) of patients (pts) receiving NEPA as an antiemetic prophylaxis during platin-based chemotherapy in a prospective non-interventional study. This group of patients presents a population at high risk for CINV.
Methods
The ongoing prospective AkyPRO study was designed to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in 2500 pts receiving NEPA for CINV prevention in single or two-day MEC or HEC over 3 cycles. The primary endpoint QoL was recorded by FLIE questionnaires. Secondary endpoints were efficacy, reported by pts and physicians on a 4-point scale; antiemetic rescue medication, and safety.
Results
In this interims analysis 595 pts receiving platin-based ctx were evaluated. PRO data show that ctx-induced vomiting can be controlled very efficiently in the majority of platin-receiving pts. Between 80-90% of pts reported no impact on daily life due to vomiting and between 84-90% of pts had a complete response (no vomiting, no rescue medication) in the 3 analysed cycles, independently of which type of platin-ctx they received. Furthermore, the majority of pts (74%, 81% and 68%, respectively) reported no or mild nausea in the cisplatin-, carboplatin- and oxaliplatin-subgroup in cycle 1. However, even mild nausea seems to have a strong impact on daily life with 40% of pts receiving cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy and 46% of oxaliplatin-receiving pts reporting an impact on daily life due to nausea in cycle 1.
Conclusions
NEPA was proven highly effective in controlling both vomiting and nausea over three cycles of ctx independent of the type of platin administered. Despite the reported MEC classification of oxaliplatin in contrast to the HEC classification of cis- and carboplatin, nausea was more difficult to control in oxaliplatin-receiving patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Riemser Pharma.
Funding
Riemser Pharma.
Disclosure
M. Karthaus: Advisory / Consultancy: Helsinn; Advisory / Consultancy: Riemser. J. Schilling: Advisory / Consultancy: Riemser. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3158 - Tobacco Retail Access and Tobacco Cessation Among Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) Survivors
Presenter: Lawson Eng
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5511 - ASSERT: A Prospective, Observational Study Measuring Sodium Improvement and Outcomes in Patients Treated for Moderate to Severe Hyponatremia Secondary to Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone secretion (SIADH) in Italy (Lung Cancer Cohort)
Presenter: Rossana Berardi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3821 - Efficacy and safety of controlled ovarian stimulation with or without letrozole co-administration for fertility preservation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Presenter: Benedetta Bonardi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2168 - Child development at 6 years after maternal cancer diagnosis and treatment during pregnancy
Presenter: Tineke Vandenbroucke
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5855 - Update of the registry of young women with cancer by the International Network of Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy
Presenter: Charlotte Maggen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5156 - Erectile dysfunction in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Ilya Tsimafeyeu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4992 - Exercise level, interest and preferences in cancer patients.
Presenter: Alice Avancini
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3427 - Filling the Gaps in Informed Consent for Advanced Cancer Patients considering Phase 1 Oncology Trials - an in-depth Qualitative Study of Key Stakeholders at a large United Kingdom Phase 1 unit
Presenter: Abhijit Pal
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3537 - Breast Cancer Patients’ Quality of Life: Real World Data
Presenter: Thanos Kosmidis
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4761 - High-sensitivity troponin as a cardiotoxicity biomarker in breast cancer treatment
Presenter: Joana Simões
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract