Abstract 4139
Background
Selecting which pts may benefit from ieCTs is challenging. Few prognostic indexes have been proposed so far and none qualifying as a predictor of response. The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRImS) identifies two prognostic categories based on three objective variables (albumin<3.5 g/dL=1; LDH>ULN=1; NLR>6=1).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data of all pts enrolled into ieCTs at the Humanitas Cancer Center Phase I Unit between 2014 and 2019. A large series of demographic and clinical variables were correlated with overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) through univariate and multivariate analysis (UVA; MVA). Laboratory parameters were calculated either as baseline values and as dynamic six-weeks (6wks) changes. Finally, we explored the performance of the GRImS in our cohort.
Results
A total of 111 pts (M/F:63/48; median age: 62) with advanced solid tumors treated into ieCTs have been selected. The most frequent histologies were hepatocellular carcinoma (34%), lung carcinoma (22%), glioblastomas (13%). With a median follow-up (FU) of 14.3 months (mos), the OS was 12.9 mos, and the ORR 12.6%. In the UVA ECOG PS < 1 (HR = 0.53; IC 0.30-0.94; p = 0.030) and higher baseline value of albumin (HR = 0.40; IC 0.21-0.77; p = 0.006) were significantly associated with a better OS, while baseline total protein level (OR = 1.47; IC 1.24 - 2.10; p = 0.030), and increase in lymphocytes count at 6wks (OR = 1.02; IC 1.00-1.04; p = 0.029) were predictive of response. In the MVA only higher baseline value of albumin seems to confirm its independent prognostic value (HR = 0.48; IC 0.23-1.01; p = 0.054), as well as baseline total protein level its predictive role (OR = 1.52; IC 1-2.33; p = 0.052). The GRImS resulted prognostic, with pts at low-risk (≤1) having a significant better OS compared to pts with a high-risk score (>1) (14.3 mos vs 7.3 mos; p = 0.029), but not predictive.
Conclusions
We assessed the prognostic accuracy of GRImS in our ieCTs cohort. With limitations due to small sample size, short FU and few events recorded we identified additional static and dynamic variables with a potential prognostic and predictive relevance to be further explored in larger series and to be eventually included in new scores.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Simonelli: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie. A. Santoro: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Gilead; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Takeda; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert Testimony: Abbvie; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Servier; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Gilead; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Arqule; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: SANDOZ. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4321 - Health-related quality of life of advanced melanoma survivors treated with CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibition: a matched cohort study
Presenter: Annelies Boekhout
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
779 - Capecitabine vs Cisplatin along with concurrent radiotherapy in the treatment of inoperable lower esophageal cancers focusing on TWISTT score and QOL
Presenter: Goutham Anugu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5914 - Cancer, Mental Health and End Life Simulation (CAMhELS): A novel effectiveness evaluation.
Presenter: Asanga Fernando
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2597 - Cancer patients’ expectations and understanding about their disease
Presenter: Mónica Pinho
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5187 - Impact of patients’ death on oncologists and coping strategies: An online survey
Presenter: Soumaya Labidi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4579 - Clinical benefit from late lines of therapy offered to patients treated in a tertiary referral centre
Presenter: Andrea Sbrana
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5058 - Preparedness for caregiving in caregivers of cancer patients
Presenter: Hatice Yakar
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5917 - Oncologic Emergency Medicine in the real world: A survey and proposal for improvement
Presenter: Carintia Dorta Pérez
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4077 - The Reality of Critical Cancer Patients in a Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit
Presenter: Tiago Filipe Da Cruz Tomas
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1728 - A phase III trial evaluating olanzapine 5 mg for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving cisplatin: J-FORCE Study
Presenter: Hironobu Hashimoto
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract