Abstract 4139
Background
Selecting which pts may benefit from ieCTs is challenging. Few prognostic indexes have been proposed so far and none qualifying as a predictor of response. The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRImS) identifies two prognostic categories based on three objective variables (albumin<3.5 g/dL=1; LDH>ULN=1; NLR>6=1).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data of all pts enrolled into ieCTs at the Humanitas Cancer Center Phase I Unit between 2014 and 2019. A large series of demographic and clinical variables were correlated with overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) through univariate and multivariate analysis (UVA; MVA). Laboratory parameters were calculated either as baseline values and as dynamic six-weeks (6wks) changes. Finally, we explored the performance of the GRImS in our cohort.
Results
A total of 111 pts (M/F:63/48; median age: 62) with advanced solid tumors treated into ieCTs have been selected. The most frequent histologies were hepatocellular carcinoma (34%), lung carcinoma (22%), glioblastomas (13%). With a median follow-up (FU) of 14.3 months (mos), the OS was 12.9 mos, and the ORR 12.6%. In the UVA ECOG PS < 1 (HR = 0.53; IC 0.30-0.94; p = 0.030) and higher baseline value of albumin (HR = 0.40; IC 0.21-0.77; p = 0.006) were significantly associated with a better OS, while baseline total protein level (OR = 1.47; IC 1.24 - 2.10; p = 0.030), and increase in lymphocytes count at 6wks (OR = 1.02; IC 1.00-1.04; p = 0.029) were predictive of response. In the MVA only higher baseline value of albumin seems to confirm its independent prognostic value (HR = 0.48; IC 0.23-1.01; p = 0.054), as well as baseline total protein level its predictive role (OR = 1.52; IC 1-2.33; p = 0.052). The GRImS resulted prognostic, with pts at low-risk (≤1) having a significant better OS compared to pts with a high-risk score (>1) (14.3 mos vs 7.3 mos; p = 0.029), but not predictive.
Conclusions
We assessed the prognostic accuracy of GRImS in our ieCTs cohort. With limitations due to small sample size, short FU and few events recorded we identified additional static and dynamic variables with a potential prognostic and predictive relevance to be further explored in larger series and to be eventually included in new scores.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Simonelli: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie. A. Santoro: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Gilead; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Takeda; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert Testimony: Abbvie; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Servier; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Gilead; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Arqule; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: SANDOZ. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2935 - Correlation of progression free survival-2 and overall survival in solid tumors
Presenter: Paul Mainwaring
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2273 - High performance of serial tumor biopsies in first in human (FIH) phase I trials.
Presenter: Jun Sato
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5933 - Response rates and lesion-level progression patterns of solid tumor patients in an academic phase 1 program: implications for tumor heterogeneity
Presenter: Christopher Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3569 - Clinical Benefit and Response Rate in Early Phase Clinical Trials: First Report from a Single-Institution Study
Presenter: Antonio Marra
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4451 - Improving patient selection for immuno-oncology phase 1 trials: an external validation of five prognostic scores at Claudius Regaud Institute of Toulouse, Oncopôle (IUCT-O).
Presenter: Ghassan Al Darazi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1696 - Demonstrating the Changing Trends in Phase 1 Clinical Trials
Presenter: Christina Guo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3202 - Participation of Women in phase 1 oncology clinical trials
Presenter: Laura Vidal
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4518 - Predictors for early trial discontinuation of patients with cancer participating in phase I clinical trials
Presenter: Joeri Douma
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4368 - Safety of Tumor Treating Fields delivery to the torso: Meta analysis from TTFields clinical trials
Presenter: Federica Grosso
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4615 - Proteomic Profiling Identifies Molecular Basis of Adverse Event to BPM31510 Exposure: Rationale for Comprehensive Molecular Pharmacodynamics (PD) in Phase 1 Clinical Trial Design
Presenter: Vivek Subbiah
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract