Abstract 4139
Background
Selecting which pts may benefit from ieCTs is challenging. Few prognostic indexes have been proposed so far and none qualifying as a predictor of response. The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRImS) identifies two prognostic categories based on three objective variables (albumin<3.5 g/dL=1; LDH>ULN=1; NLR>6=1).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data of all pts enrolled into ieCTs at the Humanitas Cancer Center Phase I Unit between 2014 and 2019. A large series of demographic and clinical variables were correlated with overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) through univariate and multivariate analysis (UVA; MVA). Laboratory parameters were calculated either as baseline values and as dynamic six-weeks (6wks) changes. Finally, we explored the performance of the GRImS in our cohort.
Results
A total of 111 pts (M/F:63/48; median age: 62) with advanced solid tumors treated into ieCTs have been selected. The most frequent histologies were hepatocellular carcinoma (34%), lung carcinoma (22%), glioblastomas (13%). With a median follow-up (FU) of 14.3 months (mos), the OS was 12.9 mos, and the ORR 12.6%. In the UVA ECOG PS < 1 (HR = 0.53; IC 0.30-0.94; p = 0.030) and higher baseline value of albumin (HR = 0.40; IC 0.21-0.77; p = 0.006) were significantly associated with a better OS, while baseline total protein level (OR = 1.47; IC 1.24 - 2.10; p = 0.030), and increase in lymphocytes count at 6wks (OR = 1.02; IC 1.00-1.04; p = 0.029) were predictive of response. In the MVA only higher baseline value of albumin seems to confirm its independent prognostic value (HR = 0.48; IC 0.23-1.01; p = 0.054), as well as baseline total protein level its predictive role (OR = 1.52; IC 1-2.33; p = 0.052). The GRImS resulted prognostic, with pts at low-risk (≤1) having a significant better OS compared to pts with a high-risk score (>1) (14.3 mos vs 7.3 mos; p = 0.029), but not predictive.
Conclusions
We assessed the prognostic accuracy of GRImS in our ieCTs cohort. With limitations due to small sample size, short FU and few events recorded we identified additional static and dynamic variables with a potential prognostic and predictive relevance to be further explored in larger series and to be eventually included in new scores.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Simonelli: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie. A. Santoro: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Gilead; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Takeda; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert Testimony: Abbvie; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Servier; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Gilead; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Arqule; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: SANDOZ. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3305 - A phase I dose-escalation and expansion trial of intratumorally administered CV8102, alone and in combination with anti-PD-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Jürgen Krauss
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5353 - Phase 1/2 Study of 9-ING-41, a small molecule selective Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Beta (GSK-3β) Inhibitor, as a Single Agent and Combined with Chemotherapy, in Patients with Refractory Hematological Malignancies or Solid Tumors
Presenter: Benedito Carneiro
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3946 - Trial in progress: a Phase I, open-label study of GSK1795091 administered in combination with immunotherapies in participants with advanced solid tumors (NCT03447314).
Presenter: Aaron Hansen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3449 - Radiographic Phenotyping to Identify Intracranial Disseminated Recurrence in Brain metastases Treated With Radiosurgery Using Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
Presenter: CheYu Hsu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4553 - Association between TP53 mutations and efficacy of Osimertinib for brain metastasis from EGFR-mutant lung cancer
Presenter: Lijuan Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4942 - Response assessment of melanoma brain metastases treated by stereotactic radiotherapy or immunotherapy or both: a comparison of RECIST 1.1, RANO and iRANO criteria
Presenter: Emilie Le Rhun
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3529 - Management of multiple brain metastases by Staged SRS focusing on utmost risk lesions
Presenter: shaoqun Li
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5315 - Whole brain radiotherapy plus simultaneous in-field boost versus whole brain radiotherapy plus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Lu Li
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1116 - 3D based texture analysis serving as potential diagnostic factor in discriminating primary central nervous system lymphoma from metastatic brain tumors: A preliminary study
Presenter: Wen Guo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5344 - Global trends in population-based survival for 303,169 adults diagnosed with glioblastoma in 44 countries during 2000-2014 (CONCORD-3)
Presenter: Fabio Girardi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract