Abstract 4139
Background
Selecting which pts may benefit from ieCTs is challenging. Few prognostic indexes have been proposed so far and none qualifying as a predictor of response. The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRImS) identifies two prognostic categories based on three objective variables (albumin<3.5 g/dL=1; LDH>ULN=1; NLR>6=1).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data of all pts enrolled into ieCTs at the Humanitas Cancer Center Phase I Unit between 2014 and 2019. A large series of demographic and clinical variables were correlated with overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) through univariate and multivariate analysis (UVA; MVA). Laboratory parameters were calculated either as baseline values and as dynamic six-weeks (6wks) changes. Finally, we explored the performance of the GRImS in our cohort.
Results
A total of 111 pts (M/F:63/48; median age: 62) with advanced solid tumors treated into ieCTs have been selected. The most frequent histologies were hepatocellular carcinoma (34%), lung carcinoma (22%), glioblastomas (13%). With a median follow-up (FU) of 14.3 months (mos), the OS was 12.9 mos, and the ORR 12.6%. In the UVA ECOG PS < 1 (HR = 0.53; IC 0.30-0.94; p = 0.030) and higher baseline value of albumin (HR = 0.40; IC 0.21-0.77; p = 0.006) were significantly associated with a better OS, while baseline total protein level (OR = 1.47; IC 1.24 - 2.10; p = 0.030), and increase in lymphocytes count at 6wks (OR = 1.02; IC 1.00-1.04; p = 0.029) were predictive of response. In the MVA only higher baseline value of albumin seems to confirm its independent prognostic value (HR = 0.48; IC 0.23-1.01; p = 0.054), as well as baseline total protein level its predictive role (OR = 1.52; IC 1-2.33; p = 0.052). The GRImS resulted prognostic, with pts at low-risk (≤1) having a significant better OS compared to pts with a high-risk score (>1) (14.3 mos vs 7.3 mos; p = 0.029), but not predictive.
Conclusions
We assessed the prognostic accuracy of GRImS in our ieCTs cohort. With limitations due to small sample size, short FU and few events recorded we identified additional static and dynamic variables with a potential prognostic and predictive relevance to be further explored in larger series and to be eventually included in new scores.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Simonelli: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie. A. Santoro: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Gilead; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Takeda; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert Testimony: Abbvie; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Servier; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Gilead; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Arqule; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: SANDOZ. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4085 - A Phase 1, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Antitumor Activity of ADCT-601 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Presenter: Anthony Tolcher
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1054 - Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of cosibelimab, an anti‐PD‐L1 antibody, in patients (pts) with advanced cancers
Presenter: Philip Clingan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4264 - A Phase I study of tinostamustine in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Alain Mita
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3811 - Lurbinectedin (LUR) in combination with Irinotecan (IRI) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Santiago Ponce Aix
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1311 - A phase I study of varlitinib (VAR; ASLAN001) an oral pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with mFOLFIRI chemotherapy in advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Aaron Tan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3482 - Phase I study of lapatinib and trametinib in patients with KRAS mutant colorectal, non-small cell lung and pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Sanne Huijberts
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4749 - Pharmacokinetic (PK) and updated survival data from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group IND.226 study of durvalumab ± tremelimumab in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy
Presenter: Desiree Hao
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4530 - A Phase 2a clinical trial combining ALRN-6924 and palbociclib for the treatment of patients with tumors harboring wild-type p53 and MDM2 amplification or MDM2/CDK4 co-amplification
Presenter: Funda Meric-Bernstam
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4280 - Updated Efficacy and Safety of Entrectinib in Patients with NTRK Fusion-Positive Tumors: Integrated Analysis of STARTRK-2, STARTRK-1 and ALKA-372-001
Presenter: Christian Rolfo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
6144 - An international randomized cross-over bio-equivalence study of oral paclitaxel + HM30181 compared with weekly intravenous (IV) paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Christopher Jackson
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract