Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2551 - Efficacy of dose-dense (DD) adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) according to immunohistochemically (IHC) defined luminal subtypes: an exploratory analysis of the GIM2 trial.
Presenter: Benedetta Conte
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3426 - High dose Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in Triple-Negative breast cancer with evidence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD).
Presenter: Sonja Vliek
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3792 - Risk factors for locoregional recurrence (LRR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: pooled analysis of prospective neoadjuvant breast cancer (BC) trials
Presenter: Gustavo Werutsky
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4044 - Estimating radiotherapy-induced cardiovascular mortality in female breast cancer patients.
Presenter: Mark De Ridder
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
719 - 3-year follow-up of a phase III trial comparing the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant and adjuvant trastuzumab and its biosimilar CT-P6 in HER2 positive early breast cancer (EBC)
Presenter: Justin Stebbing
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3595 - Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients: pattern of use and impact on overall survival
Presenter: Axel Berthelot
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3992 - Carboplatin-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): a propensity score-matched study.
Presenter: Maria Vittoria Dieci
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3477 - Impact of adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) on incidence of metastatic breast cancer (mBC): an epidemiological model of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) who did not achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant treatment (non-pCR)
Presenter: Mellissa Williamson
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3928 - Chemotherapy (CT)-induced anaemia in patients (pts) treated with dose-dense regimen: Results of the prospectively randomised anaemia substudy from the neoadjuvant GeparOcto study
Presenter: Hans Tesch
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2184 - The clinical impact of adjuvant dose-dense sequential chemotherapy (dds-CT) in patients with high-risk operable breast cancer (BC); pooled analysis of 6 clinical trials.
Presenter: Elena Fountzilas
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract