Abstract 4354
Background
Patients’ perception of clinical trials in Poland is mostly influenced by mass media. The image of CTs is often biased which may have an impact on recruitment.
Methods
Based on an anonymous 25-item Paper and Pencil Interview (PAPI) survey among 191 hospitalized oncological patients we analyzed knowledge, perception, willingness to participate and future expectations of CTs. Nominal scale: Yes/No/Don’t know, Likert scale of 0-5 points and multiple choice questions were applied.
Results
The majority of respondents were: (1) women: 70,2%, (2) people with secondary education: 57,6%, (3) at the age of 60-69: 41,9%, (4) living in cities over 100k inhabitants: 46,1%. Main findings 49,2% of respondents agreed to be enrolled in CTs; 15,3% refused and 35,4% were not certain. Among the driving factors for “YES” were: chance for a better/constant care - 76,3% and access to additional monitoring - 73,1%. 57,0% of respondents declared altruistic reason. The main reasons for not participating were: concern about toxicity - 62,1%, lack of efficacy - 55,2% and being a “guinea pig” - 41,4%. Among respondents uncertain about participation in CT, the factors of the highest impact on potential enrollment were: terminal phase of the disease/no other option: 68,7%/ 56,7%. The incentive of the family member or friend does not have a significant impact - only 19,4% respondents would follow it. Other findings 55,8%/ 54,7% of respondents do not know about the existence of any legal acts/state institutions that oversee CTs. 60,8% of respondents do not know whether there are independent bioethical committees that approve each CT prior to launch. 64,9% of respondents think that research funded by pharma companies is NOT as reliable as that of independent sources eg. medical universities. 76,2% of respondents think that the current amount of information on CTs is insufficient and 87,2% would like to know more.
Conclusions
The level of knowledge about CTs among patients is insufficient but the willingness to participate is high which is mainly driven by a possibility of a better and constant care. The trust in the pharmaceutical industry should be increased.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Kotowski: Full / Part-time employment: Roche Polska sp z o.o. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract