Abstract 4354
Background
Patients’ perception of clinical trials in Poland is mostly influenced by mass media. The image of CTs is often biased which may have an impact on recruitment.
Methods
Based on an anonymous 25-item Paper and Pencil Interview (PAPI) survey among 191 hospitalized oncological patients we analyzed knowledge, perception, willingness to participate and future expectations of CTs. Nominal scale: Yes/No/Don’t know, Likert scale of 0-5 points and multiple choice questions were applied.
Results
The majority of respondents were: (1) women: 70,2%, (2) people with secondary education: 57,6%, (3) at the age of 60-69: 41,9%, (4) living in cities over 100k inhabitants: 46,1%. Main findings 49,2% of respondents agreed to be enrolled in CTs; 15,3% refused and 35,4% were not certain. Among the driving factors for “YES” were: chance for a better/constant care - 76,3% and access to additional monitoring - 73,1%. 57,0% of respondents declared altruistic reason. The main reasons for not participating were: concern about toxicity - 62,1%, lack of efficacy - 55,2% and being a “guinea pig” - 41,4%. Among respondents uncertain about participation in CT, the factors of the highest impact on potential enrollment were: terminal phase of the disease/no other option: 68,7%/ 56,7%. The incentive of the family member or friend does not have a significant impact - only 19,4% respondents would follow it. Other findings 55,8%/ 54,7% of respondents do not know about the existence of any legal acts/state institutions that oversee CTs. 60,8% of respondents do not know whether there are independent bioethical committees that approve each CT prior to launch. 64,9% of respondents think that research funded by pharma companies is NOT as reliable as that of independent sources eg. medical universities. 76,2% of respondents think that the current amount of information on CTs is insufficient and 87,2% would like to know more.
Conclusions
The level of knowledge about CTs among patients is insufficient but the willingness to participate is high which is mainly driven by a possibility of a better and constant care. The trust in the pharmaceutical industry should be increased.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Kotowski: Full / Part-time employment: Roche Polska sp z o.o. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5877 - Efficacy of anti-PD(L)1 treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer based on mRNA- and protein- based PD-L1 determination: Results from the multicentric, retrospective FOsMIC trial
Presenter: Jonas Jarczyk
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5204 - A differential bladder microbiota composition is associated with tumor grade in bladder cancer.
Presenter: Monica Parra-Grande
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4904 - Molecular characterization of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in prior or current smokers (PCS) vs non-smokers (NS)
Presenter: Victor Sacristan Santos
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5370 - Evaluation of different diagnostic methods for identification of FGFR alteration in advanced urothelial carcinomas: Proficiency Results based on multiple RNA extraction kits and mutation detection methods
Presenter: Veronika Weyerer
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2579 - Title: Genomic characterization of non-schistosomiasis-related squamous cell carcinoma (NSR-SCC) of the urinary bladder: a retrospective study of potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers
Presenter: Esmail Al-ezzi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2203 - TiNivo: Tivozanib combined with nivolumab results in prolonged progression free survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Final Results.
Presenter: Philippe Barthelemy
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4712 - First-Line Pembrolizumab (pembro) Monotherapy for Advanced Non‒Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (nccRCC): Updated Follow-Up for KEYNOTE-427 Cohort B
Presenter: Cristina Suárez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2091 - First-Line Pembrolizumab (pembro) Monotherapy in Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC): Updated Follow-Up For KEYNOTE-427 Cohort A
Presenter: James Larkin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2368 - Association Between Depth of Response and Overall Survival: Exploratory Analysis in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC) in CheckMate 214
Presenter: Viktor Grünwald
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract