Abstract 4354
Background
Patients’ perception of clinical trials in Poland is mostly influenced by mass media. The image of CTs is often biased which may have an impact on recruitment.
Methods
Based on an anonymous 25-item Paper and Pencil Interview (PAPI) survey among 191 hospitalized oncological patients we analyzed knowledge, perception, willingness to participate and future expectations of CTs. Nominal scale: Yes/No/Don’t know, Likert scale of 0-5 points and multiple choice questions were applied.
Results
The majority of respondents were: (1) women: 70,2%, (2) people with secondary education: 57,6%, (3) at the age of 60-69: 41,9%, (4) living in cities over 100k inhabitants: 46,1%. Main findings 49,2% of respondents agreed to be enrolled in CTs; 15,3% refused and 35,4% were not certain. Among the driving factors for “YES” were: chance for a better/constant care - 76,3% and access to additional monitoring - 73,1%. 57,0% of respondents declared altruistic reason. The main reasons for not participating were: concern about toxicity - 62,1%, lack of efficacy - 55,2% and being a “guinea pig” - 41,4%. Among respondents uncertain about participation in CT, the factors of the highest impact on potential enrollment were: terminal phase of the disease/no other option: 68,7%/ 56,7%. The incentive of the family member or friend does not have a significant impact - only 19,4% respondents would follow it. Other findings 55,8%/ 54,7% of respondents do not know about the existence of any legal acts/state institutions that oversee CTs. 60,8% of respondents do not know whether there are independent bioethical committees that approve each CT prior to launch. 64,9% of respondents think that research funded by pharma companies is NOT as reliable as that of independent sources eg. medical universities. 76,2% of respondents think that the current amount of information on CTs is insufficient and 87,2% would like to know more.
Conclusions
The level of knowledge about CTs among patients is insufficient but the willingness to participate is high which is mainly driven by a possibility of a better and constant care. The trust in the pharmaceutical industry should be increased.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Kotowski: Full / Part-time employment: Roche Polska sp z o.o. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2241 - KEYNOTE-641: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Enzalutamide for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Julie Graff
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract