Abstract 5479
Background
Over 60% of patients (pts) with stage IV melanoma may develop brain metastases, resulting in a significantly increased morbidity and poor overall prognosis. Clinical data for melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treatments are limited, as controlled studies often exclude pts with untreated brain metastases.
Methods
We conducted a multicenter, retrospective case series investigation with consecutive pts with BRAF-mutant MBM who were treated with BRAF inhibitor encorafenib plus MEK inhibitor binimetinib to evaluate the antitumor response with this combination. Assessments included intracranial, extracranial & global objective response rates (ORRs; percentage of complete [CR] + partial [PR] responses) evaluated by modified RECIST version 1.1; clinical benefit rate (CBR; percentage of CR + PR + stable disease [SD] as best response); time to response, duration of response, and safety.
Results
A total of 17 pts with stage IV BRAF-mutant MBM who received encorafenib plus binimetinib in centers in the United States were included. Pts had received a median of 2 prior lines of treatment over a median of 520 days since their melanoma diagnosis (median of 55 days since diagnosis of MBM). Of the patients included, 82% had prior treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. The intracranial ORR was 35% (with 3 CRs and 3 PRs) and CBR was 76%, with a median duration of response of 17 weeks. Eight pts with either stable disease or a response were still ongoing treatment at the time of this analysis. Among the 14 MBM pts with prior BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, the intracranial ORR was 21% and CBR was 71%. Similar outcomes were observed for extracranial and global responses. The safety profile for encorafenib plus binimetinib was similar to that observed in pts with melanoma without brain metastases.
Conclusions
Combination therapy with encorafenib plus binimetinib elicited intracranial activity in pts with BRAF-mutant MBM, including in pts previously treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Further prospective studies are warranted. *K. Holbrook and J. Lutzky are co-first authors.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Editorial assistance was provided by JD Cox and Mayville Medical Communications, with funding from Array Biopharma.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Array BioPharma Inc.
Funding
Array BioPharma.
Disclosure
J. Lutzky: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Array BioPharma; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Regeneron; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb. A. Amin: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Regeneron. J.M. Davis: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Exelixis Inc; Advisory / Consultancy: Array BioPharma. M.A. Davies: Advisory / Consultancy: Array BioPharma; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche/Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Vaccinex; Advisory / Consultancy: Syndax; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Nanostring. A. Diab: Advisory / Consultancy: Array BioPharma. I.C. Glitza: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Array BioPharma. R.N. Amaria: Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Array BioPharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Iovance. S. Patel: Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Cardinal Health; Advisory / Consultancy: Castle Biosciences; Research grant / Funding (institution): Deciphera; Advisory / Consultancy, DSMB: Immunocore; Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Provectus; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), DSMB: Reata. H.A. Tawbi: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Array BioPharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): GSK. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract