Abstract 5479
Background
Over 60% of patients (pts) with stage IV melanoma may develop brain metastases, resulting in a significantly increased morbidity and poor overall prognosis. Clinical data for melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treatments are limited, as controlled studies often exclude pts with untreated brain metastases.
Methods
We conducted a multicenter, retrospective case series investigation with consecutive pts with BRAF-mutant MBM who were treated with BRAF inhibitor encorafenib plus MEK inhibitor binimetinib to evaluate the antitumor response with this combination. Assessments included intracranial, extracranial & global objective response rates (ORRs; percentage of complete [CR] + partial [PR] responses) evaluated by modified RECIST version 1.1; clinical benefit rate (CBR; percentage of CR + PR + stable disease [SD] as best response); time to response, duration of response, and safety.
Results
A total of 17 pts with stage IV BRAF-mutant MBM who received encorafenib plus binimetinib in centers in the United States were included. Pts had received a median of 2 prior lines of treatment over a median of 520 days since their melanoma diagnosis (median of 55 days since diagnosis of MBM). Of the patients included, 82% had prior treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. The intracranial ORR was 35% (with 3 CRs and 3 PRs) and CBR was 76%, with a median duration of response of 17 weeks. Eight pts with either stable disease or a response were still ongoing treatment at the time of this analysis. Among the 14 MBM pts with prior BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, the intracranial ORR was 21% and CBR was 71%. Similar outcomes were observed for extracranial and global responses. The safety profile for encorafenib plus binimetinib was similar to that observed in pts with melanoma without brain metastases.
Conclusions
Combination therapy with encorafenib plus binimetinib elicited intracranial activity in pts with BRAF-mutant MBM, including in pts previously treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Further prospective studies are warranted. *K. Holbrook and J. Lutzky are co-first authors.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Editorial assistance was provided by JD Cox and Mayville Medical Communications, with funding from Array Biopharma.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Array BioPharma Inc.
Funding
Array BioPharma.
Disclosure
J. Lutzky: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Array BioPharma; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Regeneron; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb. A. Amin: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Regeneron. J.M. Davis: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Exelixis Inc; Advisory / Consultancy: Array BioPharma. M.A. Davies: Advisory / Consultancy: Array BioPharma; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche/Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Vaccinex; Advisory / Consultancy: Syndax; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Nanostring. A. Diab: Advisory / Consultancy: Array BioPharma. I.C. Glitza: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Array BioPharma. R.N. Amaria: Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Array BioPharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Iovance. S. Patel: Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Cardinal Health; Advisory / Consultancy: Castle Biosciences; Research grant / Funding (institution): Deciphera; Advisory / Consultancy, DSMB: Immunocore; Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Provectus; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), DSMB: Reata. H.A. Tawbi: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Array BioPharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): GSK. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5877 - Efficacy of anti-PD(L)1 treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer based on mRNA- and protein- based PD-L1 determination: Results from the multicentric, retrospective FOsMIC trial
Presenter: Jonas Jarczyk
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5204 - A differential bladder microbiota composition is associated with tumor grade in bladder cancer.
Presenter: Monica Parra-Grande
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4904 - Molecular characterization of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in prior or current smokers (PCS) vs non-smokers (NS)
Presenter: Victor Sacristan Santos
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5370 - Evaluation of different diagnostic methods for identification of FGFR alteration in advanced urothelial carcinomas: Proficiency Results based on multiple RNA extraction kits and mutation detection methods
Presenter: Veronika Weyerer
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2579 - Title: Genomic characterization of non-schistosomiasis-related squamous cell carcinoma (NSR-SCC) of the urinary bladder: a retrospective study of potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers
Presenter: Esmail Al-ezzi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2203 - TiNivo: Tivozanib combined with nivolumab results in prolonged progression free survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Final Results.
Presenter: Philippe Barthelemy
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4712 - First-Line Pembrolizumab (pembro) Monotherapy for Advanced Non‒Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (nccRCC): Updated Follow-Up for KEYNOTE-427 Cohort B
Presenter: Cristina Suárez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2091 - First-Line Pembrolizumab (pembro) Monotherapy in Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC): Updated Follow-Up For KEYNOTE-427 Cohort A
Presenter: James Larkin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2368 - Association Between Depth of Response and Overall Survival: Exploratory Analysis in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC) in CheckMate 214
Presenter: Viktor Grünwald
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract